Recipient

Partner of the deceased

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Oct 2015•Latest report 27 Oct 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Partner of the deceased linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Ms. Scarlett Jukes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms. Scarlett Jukes was thrown from a horse during a trail hunting event after the horse lost its footing, and her head struck the road after her riding hat came off. She suffered a severe traumatic head injury, underwent surgery, and died in hospital on 14 February 2015. The principal concerns were that participants and hunt staff were not required to wear protective headgear complying with recognised safety standards, and that hunt staff could choose to wear non-compliant traditional hunt caps.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Partner of the deceased; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require compliant protective headgear for hunt staff riding horses during employment

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Hunt staff who are paid employees of each hunt and whose work can involve significant time riding horses are not required to wear head gear designed and manufactured to recognised safety standards. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Partner of the deceased; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MFHA recommendations permitting hunt staff to choose non-compliant protective headgear

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The current recommendations of the Master of Foxhounds Association (MFHA), the governing body, published in October 2008 provides that hunt staff should be permitted to choose whether to wear a traditional hunt cap which does not comply with recognised safety standards or to wear a 'modern hat' which does comply with the required safety standards. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Partner of the deceased; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require compliant protective headgear for public participants in hunting events

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Members of the public who participate in such- hunting events (i.e.'subscribers') are not required to wear protective head gear which complies with any relevant safety standards. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026