Recipient

Powys County Council

First report 18 Dec 2014•Latest report 9 Feb 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Welsh county council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
10

Naming this recipient

Published responses
40%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
10

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
30

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

40%published responses found
30stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Powys County Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Helen Patching and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Helen Patching, Rachael Patching and Corey Longdon died accidental deaths in Waterfall Country within Bannau Brycheiniog National Park. The principal concerns were inadequate signage about the risk of accidental falling, walkers’ lack of understanding of routes and risks, and poor mobile telephone signal delaying alerts to emergency services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide information enabling walkers to understand official routes, path closures and risks

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A previous Prevention of Future Death report has led to the erection of signage concerning the risk of drowning in the water itself. However, the current signage provision does not adequately address the significant additional risk of accidental falling. Many walkers fail to understand the official routes, closed and open paths and the significant risks they face; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate signage addressing the risk of accidental falling

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A previous Prevention of Future Death report has led to the erection of signage concerning the risk of drowning in the water itself. However, the current signage provision does not adequately address the significant additional risk of accidental falling. Many walkers fail to understand the official routes, closed and open paths and the significant risks they face; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor or non-existent mobile telephone signal in remote areas

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Mobile telephone signal is poor to non-existent in certain more remote areas, which creates delay in alerting emergency services when accidents do occur. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    High rate of trips and slips in Waterfall Country

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There is a high rate of accidents, including some fatal accidents, from trips and slips in the area known as Waterfall Country; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contribute to implementing enhanced safety signage through the Waterfall Country safety working group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Powys County Council is represented on the Waterfall Country safety working group and is contributing to ongoing efforts, including the implementation of enhanced safety signage during the current year.”

    Source location

    Response from Powys County Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Legally diverted paths and barriers are considered sufficient to deter access to hazardous routes where original paths were diverted.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The public rights of way at the Waterfalls Country site at Ystradfellte are managed by the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park Authority under a formal delegation agreement. The paths have recently been legally diverted to align with managed routes, improving safe navigation for the public. Where original paths have been diverted, sufficient measures are in place to deter access to those routes where hazards exist, including the use of barriers.”

    Source location

    Response from Powys County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Akeem Jevaughn RHODEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Akeem Jevaughn Rhoden, aged 22, drowned after voluntarily jumping from a rock into the water at Sgwd y Pannwr Waterfall on 5 June 2021; he was not a strong swimmer and his body was recovered the following day. The concerns raised were that warning signs at waterfalls in Waterfall Country were inadequate, absent at the point where he entered the water, overloaded with information, and did not clearly explain the danger posed by the force of the water.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate warning signage at points where individuals may decide to enter the water

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The signage at ALL waterfalls in ‘Waterfall Country’ must be addressed; (2) Akeem Roden was not a strong swimmer and there were no adequate signs at the point he jumped in to warn him of the potential dangers and that he might drown; (3) Signage at each waterfall should be in plain, bold, easily understandable English, spelling out the danger of the power of the water; (4) Existing signage is overloaded with information and not present at the point where individuals may decide to enter the water. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of waterfall signage to provide clear, concise warnings about the power and dangers of the water

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The signage at ALL waterfalls in ‘Waterfall Country’ must be addressed; (2) Akeem Roden was not a strong swimmer and there were no adequate signs at the point he jumped in to warn him of the potential dangers and that he might drown; (3) Signage at each waterfall should be in plain, bold, easily understandable English, spelling out the danger of the power of the water; (4) Existing signage is overloaded with information and not present at the point where individuals may decide to enter the water. ”
    Open source report
  3. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Hemanta Kumar Rai · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hemanta Kumar Rai, aged 28, drowned in August 2021 after a strong current pulled him underwater towards a waterfall while he was visiting South Wales. The concerns were inadequate and unclear signage warning of the risk of death by drowning, and uncertainty about responsibility for the area.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear responsibility for the particular area

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) It is very unclear who bears responsibility for this particular area, which borders 3 local authority areas, and falls within the National Park and NRW jurisdiction. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate, clear signage warning of the risk of death by drowning

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There is no adequate signage to warn visitors of the risk of drowning by entering the water at Sgwd Gwladys. (2) Existing signage in “Waterfall Country” is overloaded with a variety of information, which although helpful for walking routes etc, is not explicit in warning of the real danger of death from entering the water. (3) Any sign(s) erected ought to be easily visible, in plain English and spell out the risk of death by drowning. ”
    Open source report
  4. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel Joseph Gomm · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel Joseph Gomm, who had chronic mental ill health exacerbated by periods of alcohol abuse, died after deliberately self-inflicting lacerations to his neck at home on 3 June 2019. The principal concerns related to the WARRN risk-assessment tool: its format, accessibility and presentation could make fluctuating self-harm risks difficult for new or infrequent users to identify, potentially resulting in under-estimation of risk and sub-optimal mitigating measures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the WARRN assessment tool to prompt consideration and recording of advocacy referrals and capacity assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The evidence I received indicated that the WARRN assessment documentation/tool could be routinely accessed, updated & revised by the Integrated Team. It was a fluid document for the purpose of recording information as to the current assessment of risk(s) of self-harm & how that risk(s) was to be mitigated. Whilst I received evidence that in practice, such risk assessments were being undertaken with Sam, the WARRN documentation did not necessarily reflect that, nor was it optimally viewable in terms of clearly recording fluctuating presentations & any accompanying re-assessment of risk. (3) It appeared to me that the format/layout of the WARRN tool, its accessibility, & in particular, its ability to provide a user with clear & easily viewable information as to how Sam’s risk of self-harm had fluctuated/altered/changed in the months preceding his death, could lead to important information/assessments being lost to a new/infrequent user. This, for example, might be a new care co-ordinator (as in Sam’s case), Crisis Team/Community Nurse, or clinician not previously involved with Sam. (4) Given the variety of services involved in Sam’s care, this central document, addressing & recording fluctuating risk appeared to me to be a crucial document in the recording of current risk (eg emphasis). The ability of those charged with Sam’s care to view those fluctuations might be hampered by the current presentation of/access to such information. That could lead to an under-estimation of the current risk & sub-optimal mitigating measures being put in place. (5) The WARRN assessment tool might also benefit from a greater degree of interaction between it & the user. For example, it was clear, on the evidence that Social Worker’s, Mental Health Nurses & Clinicians were all busy addressing the needs (& assessing risk) of a wide number & variety of patients. Prompting (my emphasis) the user to consider & record referrals for, for example, to advocacy services & for capacity assessments might optimise the benefits of the tool & reduce the risk of such opportunities being missed/un-recorded. Such then leading to the potential absence of key information for new/infrequent users when assessing risks of self-harm ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the WARRN documentation to clearly and accessibly record fluctuating self-harm risk and reassessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The evidence I received indicated that the WARRN assessment documentation/tool could be routinely accessed, updated & revised by the Integrated Team. It was a fluid document for the purpose of recording information as to the current assessment of risk(s) of self-harm & how that risk(s) was to be mitigated. Whilst I received evidence that in practice, such risk assessments were being undertaken with Sam, the WARRN documentation did not necessarily reflect that, nor was it optimally viewable in terms of clearly recording fluctuating presentations & any accompanying re-assessment of risk. (3) It appeared to me that the format/layout of the WARRN tool, its accessibility, & in particular, its ability to provide a user with clear & easily viewable information as to how Sam’s risk of self-harm had fluctuated/altered/changed in the months preceding his death, could lead to important information/assessments being lost to a new/infrequent user. This, for example, might be a new care co-ordinator (as in Sam’s case), Crisis Team/Community Nurse, or clinician not previously involved with Sam. (4) Given the variety of services involved in Sam’s care, this central document, addressing & recording fluctuating risk appeared to me to be a crucial document in the recording of current risk (eg emphasis). The ability of those charged with Sam’s care to view those fluctuations might be hampered by the current presentation of/access to such information. That could lead to an under-estimation of the current risk & sub-optimal mitigating measures being put in place. (5) The WARRN assessment tool might also benefit from a greater degree of interaction between it & the user. For example, it was clear, on the evidence that Social Worker’s, Mental Health Nurses & Clinicians were all busy addressing the needs (& assessing risk) of a wide number & variety of patients. Prompting (my emphasis) the user to consider & record referrals for, for example, to advocacy services & for capacity assessments might optimise the benefits of the tool & reduce the risk of such opportunities being missed/un-recorded. Such then leading to the potential absence of key information for new/infrequent users when assessing risks of self-harm ”
    Open source report
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Margaret May Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Margaret May Lewis was fatally injured on 6 November 2020 when she was struck by a car while crossing the B4398 to re-join the Montgomeryshire Canal towpath. The report identifies concerns about the risk of similar accidents because the road has a 60 mph speed limit, electric cars may be difficult to hear, and pedestrians exercising may wear earphones.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of pedestrian collisions when crossing the B4398

    Wider context from the report

    “The Montgomeryshire canal and its adjacent towpath is a popular venue for adults with children and dogs; and joggers many of whom will wear earphones. They, like Mrs. Lewis who was thought to be wearing earphones at the time, will need to cross the B4398 (which has a 60 mph speed limit) to continue their exercise. With the increasing popularity of noiseless electric cars, the frequency of wearing earphones whilst taking exercise and the B4398 having a 60mph speed limit, I consider there is a risk of reoccurrence of such an accident. Within the Highway Code for pedestrians it states “Keep looking and listening for traffic while you cross, in case there is any traffic you did not see, or in case other traffic appears suddenly. Do not walk diagonally across the road.” ”
    Open source report
  6. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Rhodri Dafydd Miller-Binding and 3 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 6 March 2015, a vehicle collision on the A470 near the Storey Arms, Brecon resulted in the deaths of Rhodri Dafydd Miller-Binding, Corey Bailey Price, Alesha Marie O’Connor and Margaret Elizabeth Challis. The principal concern was that the challenging bend lacked an advance warning sign, which the inquest evidence indicated could help reduce the risk of similar fatal collisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an advance warning sign for the approaching left bend

    Wider context from the report

    “1) The stretch of road along the A470 is subject to a 60 mile per hour speed limit but is known to be particularly “challenging” stretch of road on which there have been many serious injury and fatality collisions in the past. The evidence at the inquest from the Forensic Collision Investigating Officer was clear in that an advanced warning sign of an approaching left bend would be of significant assistance in warning motorists of the nature of the road ahead and thereby reducing the risk of a similar fatality. Whilst there was evidence at the inquest to support the view that Rhodri Milling- Binding’s vehicle was being driven at an inappropriate speed, it was not felt that any form of speed restriction was appropriate at this location – simply an advanced warning sign of the nature of the road ahead. ”
    Open source report
  7. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Brendan Owain Ryan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brendan Owain Ryan, aged 21, was the front-seat passenger in a Peugeot 205 that left the A488 between Pen-Y-Bont and Knighton on 31 July 2013 and collided with a fence before entering a field. He was declared deceased at the scene; the inquest concluded the death was due to a road traffic collision, with neck injuries recorded as the medical cause. The principal concern was an unusually high number of collisions at or near the location, with evidence indicating that excessive speed was likely, and consideration of a restricted speed area was raised.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unusually high number of collisions at a particular road location

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There is evidence of an unusually high number of incidents taking place at this particular location. Powys County Council are aware of three injury collisions and there is evidence, from the residents of Brook House, that there have been many accidents at or near this location which the evidence indicated are most likely to have been caused by excess speed. Furthermore it is believed there were three collisions at or near this collision site within a six day period surrounding this incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive vehicle speeds at or near the collision location

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There is evidence of an unusually high number of incidents taking place at this particular location. Powys County Council are aware of three injury collisions and there is evidence, from the residents of Brook House, that there have been many accidents at or near this location which the evidence indicated are most likely to have been caused by excess speed. Furthermore it is believed there were three collisions at or near this collision site within a six day period surrounding this incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Powys County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive vehicle speeds on bends at the road location

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Evidence from the Collision Investigator in this case showed that the maximum speed at which the bends in this road at this location could be travelled at were 50 and 53 mph depending on the direction of approach. Whilst it is acknowledged that the County Council have installed new signage and double white lines in the area in light of the unusually high number of incidents in which vehicles appear to have left the road, most likely as a direct result of excessive speed, it is felt that consideration ought to be given to a restricted speed area at this location. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Erect additional series-of-bends warning signs on both approaches.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Surveys into the signing and lining resulted in sections of double solid white centre line being introduced through the bends and additional series of bends warning signs being erected on both approaches. The solid centre lines were considered appropriate not just because of the reduced forward visibility but also from concerns raised by the Community Council of poor overtaking manoeuvres. Verge marker posts have also been added adjacent to the bridge parapet to highlight its presence and assist in denoting the road alignment.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce double solid white centre lines through the bends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Surveys into the signing and lining resulted in sections of double solid white centre line being introduced through the bends and additional series of bends warning signs being erected on both approaches. The solid centre lines were considered appropriate not just because of the reduced forward visibility but also from concerns raised by the Community Council of poor overtaking manoeuvres. Verge marker posts have also been added adjacent to the bridge parapet to highlight its presence and assist in denoting the road alignment.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement temporary traffic management measures at the site pending completion of detailed surveys.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the fatal collision on the 6th August 2013 a number of measures were taken at this site. This initially consisted of temporary traffic management measures until detailed surveys could be undertaken to establish the road conditions.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete road-surface reprofiling works addressing the surveyed area of concern northwest of the bridge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The surface grip test indicated that the surface was fine but a topographical survey noted a small area of concern to the northwest of the bridge. As a result of the survey, a reprofiling scheme was identified and works were completed during summer of 2014 following a successful bid to the Welsh Government for grant funding.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add verge marker posts beside the bridge parapet to highlight the bridge and road alignment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Surveys into the signing and lining resulted in sections of double solid white centre line being introduced through the bends and additional series of bends warning signs being erected on both approaches. The solid centre lines were considered appropriate not just because of the reduced forward visibility but also from concerns raised by the Community Council of poor overtaking manoeuvres. Verge marker posts have also been added adjacent to the bridge parapet to highlight its presence and assist in denoting the road alignment.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing engineering measures are considered sufficient to meet the authority’s duty, and guidance makes a lower speed limit inappropriate for this individual hazard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These engineering measures are considered appropriate measures to meet the duty of this Authority under Section 122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended. Given this and the Welsh Government guidance not recommending speed limits for individual hazards it is not considered appropriate to impose a lower speed limit at this location.”

    Source location

    2014-0541-Response-by-Powys-County-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 December 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

40%
40%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%40%27%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026