Recipient

RAC Motor Sports Association

Pin Request correction

First report 23 May 2014•Latest report 23 May 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from RAC Motor Sports Association linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Rutland and North Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Christian Murray Cecil Devereux · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christian Murray Cecil Devereux died at the scene after suffering head injuries in a frontal collision while driving in a race at Donington circuit on 5 May 2013. The report raised concerns that he was not wearing a HANS-type device and that wearing one might have prevented or reduced his injuries.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to RAC Motor Sports Association; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to wear a HAN’s type device

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) He was not wearing a HAN’s type device, and had he been wearing one it is likely that it would have prevented or reduced the injury he received. (6) It was estimated by the witnesses that approximately 50% of drivers in that particular race were wearing HAN’s type devices. (7) The cost of buying a HAN’s type device is approximately £200, which is considerably less than the cost of a helmet, and a small amount compared with the cost of entering that specific race. (8) The advantages of wearing the HAN’s type device considerably outweigh the disadvantages. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026