Recipient

Rambleguard Ltd

Pin Request correction

First report 28 Sep 2017•Latest report 28 Sep 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Rambleguard Ltd linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Pauline Hayston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pauline Hayston, who had reduced mobility, frailty and recent falls, sustained an unwitnessed fall while attempting to mobilise as an inpatient and later died following a fractured neck of femur and resulting immobility. The concerns identified related to the reliability and fitness for purpose of the Rambledguard falls mats, the suitability of the wireless system when several mats were in use, and the absence of technical instructions for nursing staff about operational problems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Rambleguard Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide nursing staff with instructions on the operational integrity of essential falls-risk equipment

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence raises the following concerns: 1. The reliability of the Rambledguard fall mats and its fitness for purpose. 2. The suitability of a wireless “WiFi” activated where several fall mats are in place in proximity to each other. 3. Insertion of instructions to nursing staff where the operational integrity of an essential equipment to alleviate falls risks has been identified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Rambleguard Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsuitability of wireless WiFi activation when several fall mats are in proximity

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence raises the following concerns: 1. The reliability of the Rambledguard fall mats and its fitness for purpose. 2. The suitability of a wireless “WiFi” activated where several fall mats are in place in proximity to each other. 3. Insertion of instructions to nursing staff where the operational integrity of an essential equipment to alleviate falls risks has been identified. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Rambleguard Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unreliability of Rambledguard fall mats for their intended purpose

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence raises the following concerns: 1. The reliability of the Rambledguard fall mats and its fitness for purpose. 2. The suitability of a wireless “WiFi” activated where several fall mats are in place in proximity to each other. 3. Insertion of instructions to nursing staff where the operational integrity of an essential equipment to alleviate falls risks has been identified. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026