Recipient

Recipient name withheld

Pin Request correction

First report 18 Dec 2014•Latest report 18 Dec 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Recipient name withheld linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Brendan Owain Ryan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brendan Owain Ryan, aged 21, was the front-seat passenger in a Peugeot 205 that left the A488 between Pen-Y-Bont and Knighton on 31 July 2013 and collided with a fence before entering a field. He was declared deceased at the scene; the inquest concluded the death was due to a road traffic collision, with neck injuries recorded as the medical cause. The principal concern was an unusually high number of collisions at or near the location, with evidence indicating that excessive speed was likely, and consideration of a restricted speed area was raised.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unusually high number of collisions at a particular road location

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There is evidence of an unusually high number of incidents taking place at this particular location. Powys County Council are aware of three injury collisions and there is evidence, from the residents of Brook House, that there have been many accidents at or near this location which the evidence indicated are most likely to have been caused by excess speed. Furthermore it is believed there were three collisions at or near this collision site within a six day period surrounding this incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive vehicle speeds at or near the collision location

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There is evidence of an unusually high number of incidents taking place at this particular location. Powys County Council are aware of three injury collisions and there is evidence, from the residents of Brook House, that there have been many accidents at or near this location which the evidence indicated are most likely to have been caused by excess speed. Furthermore it is believed there were three collisions at or near this collision site within a six day period surrounding this incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive vehicle speeds on bends at the road location

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Evidence from the Collision Investigator in this case showed that the maximum speed at which the bends in this road at this location could be travelled at were 50 and 53 mph depending on the direction of approach. Whilst it is acknowledged that the County Council have installed new signage and double white lines in the area in light of the unusually high number of incidents in which vehicles appear to have left the road, most likely as a direct result of excessive speed, it is felt that consideration ought to be given to a restricted speed area at this location. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026