Recipient

Recipient name withheld

Pin Request correction

First report 11 Sep 2015•Latest report 11 Sep 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Recipient name withheld linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Ronald Francis Bonfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Ronald Francis Bonfield sustained a head injury at home on 29 September 2014, was admitted to Prince Charles Hospital on 1 October, and died there on 2 October 2014. The inquest recorded that he was taking Warfarin, was over-anticoagulated, and that his INR levels were not being monitored as required. The substantive concerns related to inconsistent procedures for monitoring delegated INR testing and the risk of unmonitored over-anticoagulation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unmonitored over-anticoagulation following omitted delegated INR testing

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Until such action is taken there remains a risk that a future death(s) could occur in similar circumstances to Mr Bonfield’s, where delegated INR testing has not been done leading to unmonitored over anti-coagulation ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Non-uniform implementation of monitoring practices for delegated INR testing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The practices and procedures implemented by the Practice 1, Keir Hardie Health Park, GP Surgery following Mr Bonfield’s death (with regard to monitoring the compliance of the Health Boards District Nurse Teams following delegation to undertake a patient’s INR testing) is not uniform and/or implemented across all of the Health Boards Level 4 Accredited GP practices. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of unmonitored or unactioned failure to complete delegated INR testing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The practices and procedures implemented by Practice 1, Keir Hardie Health Park Surgery act as a check and balance to reduce the risk of an unmonitored/unactioned failure on the part of the District Nurse service to undertake the task(testing the patients INR level) delegated to them by the GP practice concerned. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026