Recipient

Recipient name withheld

First report 26 Nov 2018•Latest report 26 Nov 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Recipient name withheld linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Jack Riding · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Riding collapsed while playing football after a genetic heart condition caused his heart to stop, and he was declared dead in hospital on 15 August 2018. The report raised concerns about delays in deploying a defibrillator and directing ambulance personnel to the pitch, as well as the adequacy of emergency medical risk assessments, first-aid training, and related procedures. The report stated that these delays could not be said to have contributed to Mr Riding’s death but presented a risk of future death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure prompt access to and deployment of the defibrillator

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) I heard evidence that there was a significant delay in bringing a defibrillator to the pitch where Jack Riding had collapsed. There was a delay of some minutes before the defibrillator was deployed. I make it clear that this could not be said to be a contributing factor in Mr Riding’s death. I have received evidence of the systems in place today for the defibrillator from Goals Soccer Centres plc. It remains a concern to me that when matches are being played that the defibrillator is kept away from the pitch and the deployment of the equipment is dependent on which members of staff are present. I am concerned that any delay in the deployment of this emergency equipment presents a risk of future death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clearly defined first aid training

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) I have seen a limited risk assessment to consider what should be done in the case of a medical emergency on the pitch. I have seen no clear indication of the extent and subject matter of any first aid training. I have seen evidence that training has taken place. In the absence of any such evidence I am concerned that a lack of training may present a risk of future death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited risk assessment for medical emergencies on the pitch

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) I have seen a limited risk assessment to consider what should be done in the case of a medical emergency on the pitch. I have seen no clear indication of the extent and subject matter of any first aid training. I have seen evidence that training has taken place. In the absence of any such evidence I am concerned that a lack of training may present a risk of future death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training and drills for directing emergency services

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I heard evidence that there was a significant delay in the ambulance personnel getting to the pitch after arriving at the front gates of the Goals Soccer Centres Plc premises. I saw some CCTV evidence that there was no one in the car park to meet and direct the paramedic crew. I have read the representations, from Goals Soccer Centres Plc, in particular appendix 13 for dealing with the arrival of emergency services, but it remains a concern to me how it is ensured the policy in place is followed to ensure that in the case of an emergency that valuable moments are not lost by paramedics not being directed appropriately. I have seen Appendix 2 of the response of Goals Soccer Centres Plc which sets out that the personnel at Goals, Liverpool North have been made aware of the new policy but I have seen insufficient evidence of programmes of training to be carried out in the future, or of training drills, or the like. I am concerned that whilst it could not be said on the evidential balance to have contributed to Mr Riding’s death, any delay of this kind presents a risk of future death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure appropriate direction of arriving paramedics

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I heard evidence that there was a significant delay in the ambulance personnel getting to the pitch after arriving at the front gates of the Goals Soccer Centres Plc premises. I saw some CCTV evidence that there was no one in the car park to meet and direct the paramedic crew. I have read the representations, from Goals Soccer Centres Plc, in particular appendix 13 for dealing with the arrival of emergency services, but it remains a concern to me how it is ensured the policy in place is followed to ensure that in the case of an emergency that valuable moments are not lost by paramedics not being directed appropriately. I have seen Appendix 2 of the response of Goals Soccer Centres Plc which sets out that the personnel at Goals, Liverpool North have been made aware of the new policy but I have seen insufficient evidence of programmes of training to be carried out in the future, or of training drills, or the like. I am concerned that whilst it could not be said on the evidential balance to have contributed to Mr Riding’s death, any delay of this kind presents a risk of future death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear timescale for reviewing Health and Safety processes and procedures

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) I note that Goals Soccer Centres Plc recognise a need to review the Health and Safety processes. They have instructed an Independent Consultant to undertake a review of Health and Safety processes and procedures but with no clear timescale for this review I am still of the view that I am under a duty to prepare this report. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026