Recipient

Royal Life Saving Society UK

Pin Request correction

First report 16 Nov 2017•Latest report 16 Nov 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Registered charity. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Royal Life Saving Society UK linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Cleon GRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Cleon Grant suffered a cardiac event while swimming in a public pool, drifted to the bottom, and died on poolside after lifeguards attempted resuscitation. The principal concern was that he remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before being noticed, raising issues about lifeguard positioning, the number of lifeguards, and the possible use of motion early warning systems and training footage.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Life Saving Society UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of a motion early warning system for poolside surveillance

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Life Saving Society UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to change lifeguard positions at planned intervals

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Life Saving Society UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient poolside lifeguard staffing

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%67%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026