Recipient

Royal Mail

First report 29 Jan 2020•Latest report 29 Jan 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Public corporation. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports: 1
Published responses: 0%
Concerns addressed: 0
Stated actions: 0

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found

0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Royal Mail linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

29 Jan2020
East London
Concerns raised6
1. Lack of support or education for families and carers managing emotionally unstable personality disorder
2. Failure to make arrangements to address risks when closing crisis team referrals
3. Lack of a process for families to escalate concerns to prevent delivery of hazardous packages
1. Failure to inform families about the facility for reopening crisis team support
2. Delays of 14 days in securing mental health act assessments
3. Failure to act on an inpatient admission plan following identification of acute suicide risk
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
AI-generated summary

Thiago Araujo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

Report summary

Thiago Araujo was found deceased at his mother’s shared address on 5 February 2020 after deliberately ingesting a substance. He had been receiving community psychiatric care and had disengaged from crisis-team support. Concerns included the closure of his crisis-team referral without arrangements to address identified risks, inaction after an acute suicide risk was identified, and the lack of a process for his family to escalate concerns about delivery of a potentially harmful package.

Read the report on judiciary.uk
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of support or education for families and carers managing emotionally unstable personality disorder
Wider context from the report
“3. Family and carers of patients diagnosed with emotionally unstable personality disorder do not receive support or education upon management of this diagnosis from Camden and Islington NHS Trust, unless the patient has been received for treatment by the personality disorder service. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to make arrangements to address risks when closing crisis team referrals
Wider context from the report
“1. On 24 January 2020 Mr Araujo had discharged himself from psychiatric inpatient care he was to be supervised by the Camden and Islington NHS trust crisis team. Mr Araujo failed to engage with the crisis team and following a meeting on 30 January 2020 the crisis team closed Mr Araujo’s referral. In the course of this closure no arrangements were made to address the risks presented by Mr Araujo. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of a process for families to escalate concerns to prevent delivery of hazardous packages
Wider context from the report
“6. In the days leading to Mr Araujo’s death his family became aware that he had made an online purchase of ████████ which was to be delivered to his father’s home address. Despite raising these issues with Camden and Islington NHS trust, the Metropolitan police and employees of the post office there appeared to be no process available to the family to escalate their concerns to prevent delivery of this package. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to inform families about the facility for reopening crisis team support
Wider context from the report
“2. Following Mr Araujo’s death it has become clear that the closure of his case by the crisis team was not permanent, and had Mr Araujo or his family approached the crisis team to reopen his case, steps could have been taken to reinstate crisis team support. Mr Araujo’s family were unaware of this facility. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Delays of 14 days in securing mental health act assessments
Wider context from the report
“5. In evidence the community recovery team indicated that a factor in their inaction was the knowledge that arranging a section 135 mental health act 1983 warrant assessment would take two weeks. Such an assessment requires actions by an approved mental health practitioner from the local authority, two section 12 mental health act approved doctors, the assistance of the Metropolitan police and the local magistrates court to secure a warrant. A delay of 14 days in securing a mental health act assessment is in my opinion unacceptable. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Royal Mail; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to act on an inpatient admission plan following identification of acute suicide risk
Wider context from the report
“4. By 4 February 2020 the Camden and Islington community recovery team identified an acute risk of suicide in Mr Araujo, faced with his non-compliance with community treatment they considered an admission into inpatient care. No actions were taken to affect this plan. ”
Open source report

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Concerns raised6

Lack of support or education for families and carers managing emotionally unstable personality disorder

Failure to make arrangements to address risks when closing crisis team referrals

Lack of a process for families to escalate concerns to prevent delivery of hazardous packages

Failure to inform families about the facility for reopening crisis team support

Delays of 14 days in securing mental health act assessments

Failure to act on an inpatient admission plan following identification of acute suicide risk