Recipient

Stoke-on-Trent City Council

First report 14 Sep 2015•Latest report 14 Apr 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English unitary authority. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
5

Naming this recipient

Published responses
60%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
17

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
23

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

60%published responses found
23stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Stoke-on-Trent City Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Darren Clifford Docherty · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Darren Clifford Docherty was released from HMP Stoke Heath without accommodation and was subsequently found hanging from a tree on 10 August 2023. The report raised concern that people released from prison without accommodation may be unable to access GP and community mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure access to GP and community mental health services for people released from prison

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That when people are released from prison they do so, on many occasions, with no accommodation. Those that need GP access and community mental health services are unable to access them in these circumstances. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of accommodation for people released from prison

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That when people are released from prison they do so, on many occasions, with no accommodation. Those that need GP access and community mental health services are unable to access them in these circumstances. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with prison-service partners to maintain a clear referral pathway explaining housing options before release, beyond the Duty to Refer mechanism.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. We will continue to work with partners across the prison service to ensure a clear referral pathway is in place above and beyond the Duty to Refer mechanism so that everyone has a better understanding of the housing options available before a prisoner is released, however, it must be recognised that this is unlikely to result in a firm offer of accommodation for everyone especially those that have no priority need;”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with prisons through established mechanisms, including pre-release panels, to maintain robust procedures for people released at risk of homelessness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We will continue to work with prisons to ensure robust procedures are in place for those being released at risk of homelessness through already established mechanisms such as the pre-release panel, a joint meeting between prison based accommodation staff and the Council’s dedicated Housing Needs”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with health and social-care colleagues to link people released without accommodation to homeless healthcare, mental-health nursing and wider homelessness support services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. We will continue to work with colleagues in health and social care to support individuals released from prison with no accommodation to access GP and community mental health services by ensuring they are aware of and linked into the existing Homeless Healthcare Service and Rough Sleeping Mental Health nurse and the wider support available through Hanley Connects, the City Council’s Homelessness Hub and the Rough Sleeper Outreach Service.”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Duty to Refer process to ensure referrals receive a response within three days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We have already completed a review of the Duty to Refer process to ensure all referrals receive a response within 3 days of receipt so that prisoners due for release and their representatives in the prison service are aware they need to either approach the Housing Solutions Service within office hours or the Emergency Duty Team outside of office hours if they are released with no accommodation secured on the day of their release;”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Council cannot offer immediate accommodation to everyone leaving custody because legal duties, accommodation shortages and resource constraints limit provision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Despite the `Duty to Refer,` there is no absolute duty on a local housing authority to provide accommodation for all households or individuals who present as homeless. It should be acknowledged and noted that most local authorities, including Stoke-on-Trent, will provide accommodation for certain non-priority households at their”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Central Government should be separately asked to consider legal duties for interim accommodation and funding for local authorities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We as a Local Authority take our responsibilities to those leaving custody extremely seriously but regrettably do not have sufficient accommodation or resources available to make an offer of immediate accommodation at the point of presentation to everyone regardless of priority need. It is therefore suggested that the Coroner may wish to separately consider making a Report to Central Government in terms of the legal duties that apply to offers of interim accommodation, especially for those leaving custody and the allocation of funding to Local Authorities to provide this.”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Council cannot directly address access to GP or community mental health services because it does not commission those services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the local authority does not commission GP or community mental health services and is therefore not in a position to directly address these concerns, it is aware that homelessness should not be a barrier to registration with a GP.”

    Source location

    Response from Stoke on Trent City Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response
  2. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Minaal Salam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Minaal Salam, aged 5, was struck by a Volkswagen Touran outside her primary school on Waterside Drive on 1 April 2022 and died at the scene. The concern was that traffic management around the school should be investigated, as inadequate traffic measures could pose a risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review traffic measures around the school

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest I heard evidence to suggest that investigations into the traffic is managed around this school should be done to prevent future occurrences. In light of this, I have a concern that, if the traffic measures are not looked at, there is a risk of future deaths ”
    Open source report
  3. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Zainab Adam Bargo Hashim and Tafaoul Abdullilia Abdulkarim · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Zainab Adam Bargo Hashim died on 2 October 2017 and Tafaoul Abdullilia Abdulkarim died two days later after inhaling fire fumes while attempting to flee a fire through the communal area of their block of flats. The report identified concern that residents were unaware of the council’s “Stay Put” policy and that the policy’s communication had not been changed after the incident, creating a risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a plan to make residents aware of the “Stay Put” fire policy

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence to the effect that, within the properties that they own (they have some 19000 properties), if the properties are blocks of flats, there is a “Stay Put” policy in place. Residents, so long as the fire is not within their property, should stay in their flats, alert the appropriate emergency service, and wait for help. It became apparent during the course of the inquest that no resident at the Ringland Close block of flats knew of the existence of this policy. Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence to the effect that to communicate this policy to their residents they do so in exactly the same way that they had before the fire at Ringland Close. There are fire notices in the communal areas of the flats and in September 2017, a tenant newsletter was posted through all letterboxes at relevant blocks of flats. This newsletter reiterated the “Stay Put” policy. During this particular incident no residents had stayed within their property. No residents were aware of the “Stay Put” policy. Evidence was heard that, had Zainab and Tafaoul, stayed within ████████ the two deaths would not have occurred. Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence that, since the fire, they have not changed the way the policy is communicated to residents of their properties. Therefore, the lack of awareness of a policy in place, and lack of plan to make residents aware, in the event of a fire leads me to conclude that there is a risk of future deaths occurring. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure residents’ awareness of the “Stay Put” fire policy

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence to the effect that, within the properties that they own (they have some 19000 properties), if the properties are blocks of flats, there is a “Stay Put” policy in place. Residents, so long as the fire is not within their property, should stay in their flats, alert the appropriate emergency service, and wait for help. It became apparent during the course of the inquest that no resident at the Ringland Close block of flats knew of the existence of this policy. Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence to the effect that to communicate this policy to their residents they do so in exactly the same way that they had before the fire at Ringland Close. There are fire notices in the communal areas of the flats and in September 2017, a tenant newsletter was posted through all letterboxes at relevant blocks of flats. This newsletter reiterated the “Stay Put” policy. During this particular incident no residents had stayed within their property. No residents were aware of the “Stay Put” policy. Evidence was heard that, had Zainab and Tafaoul, stayed within ████████ the two deaths would not have occurred. Stoke-on-Trent City Council gave evidence that, since the fire, they have not changed the way the policy is communicated to residents of their properties. Therefore, the lack of awareness of a policy in place, and lack of plan to make residents aware, in the event of a fire leads me to conclude that there is a risk of future deaths occurring. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake more in-depth questioning of Stay Put Block tenants and use the resulting feedback to inform the fire-safety communication strategy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “More in depth questioning will be undertaken of tenants in Stay Put Blocks, of their understanding of the Stay Put Policy. Feedback obtained will be used to inform the Council’s communication strategy around fire safety going forward.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a fire-safety and Stay Put video and question-and-answer materials for residents with different learning styles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also in the formative stages of developing a video on fire safety and Stay Put and a series of questions and answers to help to communicate the Stay Put Policy to residents with different types of learning styles. It is intended that the video will be watched during the application process for Council housing by those who have been offered a Council property and be available to all tenants.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the frequency of fire-safety and Stay Put communications to leaseholders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Council will review the frequency of how it communicates with leaseholders around fire safety and Stay Put.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage tenants through Tenant Board participation, community events, leaseholder newsletters, councillor surgeries and promoted fire-safety services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Council has a Tenant Board which represents the diverse demographic residing in Council owned and managed social housing in Stoke-on-Trent, with the purpose of giving tenants a voice on key aspects of housing management. The seven Tenant Board Members are involved in how the Stay Put Policy is communicated and recently participated in trialling the Proactive Calls.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide, translate, display and periodically redistribute Fire Safety Notices explaining the Stay Put Policy to residents and leaseholders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All residents in Stay Put Blocks receive a copy of the Fire Safety Notice (Appendix A) produced in partnership with Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service which sets out concisely what they should do in the event of a fire.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate and verify understanding of the Stay Put Policy during tenancy visits using trained Housing Officers, scripted questions, declarations and documented checklists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Stay Put Policy is verbally communicated to tenants of the Stay Put Blocks when an annual Tenancy Audit Visit is carried out by Housing Officers. Housing Officers are trained on Fire Safety Awareness and how to communicate the Stay Put Policy. This training is refreshed annually.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Post Fire Safety Notices through all leaseholder properties’ letterboxes and explain leaseholders’ responsibility to inform and educate sub-tenants.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Fire Safety Notices will be posted through the letterbox of all leaseholder properties and leaseholders will be made aware that it is their responsibility as landlord to make sure that their sub-tenants are aware of the Stay Put Policy and understand it. This will start with immediate effect.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Housing Officers conducting Tenancy Audit Visits to complete enhanced training on communicating with tenants whose first language is not English.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Housing Officers undertaking Tenancy Audit Visits will be required to undertake enhanced training on communicating with tenants who don’t speak English as a first language.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use proactive telephone calls to discuss fire safety, check tenants’ understanding and update relevant records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, Proactive Calls to tenants have been introduced whereby the Council will attempt to contact all tenants by telephone and discuss fire safety and to check understanding about the Stay Put Policy where appropriate amongst other matters. This method of communication is also used to update our records of any changes in the tenant’s details, and listen to tenant’s views on how safe and secure they feel.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore the effectiveness of displaying additional communal notices explaining that Fire Safety Notices can be requested in other languages.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Council is also exploring the effectiveness of also displaying an additional notice in communal areas of all Stay Put Blocks explaining that the Fire Safety Notice can be requested in other languages.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider increasing targeted digital communications conveying the Stay Put Policy to residents in Stay Put Blocks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Council will consider increasing the use of targeted digital communication methods to convey the message of Stay Put to residents in Stay Put Blocks e.g. including this information in mast banners, signage boxes, tenants e bulletins and rent bills.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide accessible fire-safety communication through translation, imagery, disability-adapted communication, interpreters and coordinated support for tenants requiring additional assistance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where English is not a tenant’s first language, the Lettings staff will employ the services of a translator to attend Sign Up Visits with them to translate the Stay Put Policy (amongst other things) and to interpret any questions asked. This service is free of charge to tenants. This process is recorded in a recently developed Fire Safety Advice Check List. If a tenant requires ongoing translation support at Tenancy Audit Visits this is provided by arranging for the attendance of the family and friends who speak English or if necessary the services of a professional translator will again be provided by the Council.”

    Source location

    2021-0205-Response-from-Stoke-on-Trent-City-Council_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response
  4. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Peter Banks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Peter Banks, aged 64, took 44 co-codamol tablets after pulling open a locked medicine cupboard at his assisted accommodation on 1 January 2020. He was admitted to hospital and died on 8 January 2020 from an acute heart attack; the overdose contributed to his death, although it was not possible to determine whether it was accidental or deliberate. Concerns were raised about the lack of safe medication storage for residents needing supervision and about the apparent investigation being perfunctory and conducted by an untrained staff member.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of safe medication storage for residents requiring supervision

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The deceased resided at Oak Priory and was the tenant of a privately rented flat in a scheme from a housing provider. He was on a care package provided by Comfort Call under a contract from Stoke on Trent Council. He received visit four times per day principally to administer medication. The medicine was kept in a locked kitchen cupboard in his flat. He had been identified as not being able to manage his own medication. The tenant was easily able to pull open the cupboard door and the barrel of the lock fell out. He overdosed on medication. There appears to be no system of safe storage in place where a resident has been identified as being in need of supervision with medication. (2)The apparent investigation into the incident was perfunctory and carried out by an untrained member of staff. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of untrained staff to conduct incident investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The deceased resided at Oak Priory and was the tenant of a privately rented flat in a scheme from a housing provider. He was on a care package provided by Comfort Call under a contract from Stoke on Trent Council. He received visit four times per day principally to administer medication. The medicine was kept in a locked kitchen cupboard in his flat. He had been identified as not being able to manage his own medication. The tenant was easily able to pull open the cupboard door and the barrel of the lock fell out. He overdosed on medication. There appears to be no system of safe storage in place where a resident has been identified as being in need of supervision with medication. (2)The apparent investigation into the incident was perfunctory and carried out by an untrained member of staff. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Perfunctory incident investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The deceased resided at Oak Priory and was the tenant of a privately rented flat in a scheme from a housing provider. He was on a care package provided by Comfort Call under a contract from Stoke on Trent Council. He received visit four times per day principally to administer medication. The medicine was kept in a locked kitchen cupboard in his flat. He had been identified as not being able to manage his own medication. The tenant was easily able to pull open the cupboard door and the barrel of the lock fell out. He overdosed on medication. There appears to be no system of safe storage in place where a resident has been identified as being in need of supervision with medication. (2)The apparent investigation into the incident was perfunctory and carried out by an untrained member of staff. ”
    Open source report
  5. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER died at a nursing home on 21 October 2014 from lobar pneumonia, with suppurative cystitis, a sacral pressure ulcer, aortic stenosis, multiple myeloma and stroke also recorded. The principal concerns included missed turns, inaccurate or falsified records, inadequate pressure-mattress checks, poor recording of food and fluid intake, inadequate staff training and continuity, delayed referral to tissue viability nurses, and insufficient response to weight loss and safeguarding concerns. The inquest concluded that she died from significant natural disease, with a contributing sacral ulcer whose progress had been compromised by gaps in nursing care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate recording of food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Records were difficult to interpret and did not accurately record times at which fluid and food had been offered to the deceased. The amounts taken by the deceased were not adequately recorded. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain full details before closing Adult Protection investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “9. Single agency staff investigating Adult Protections Referrals had closed their investigation and recorded the allegations as unsubstantiated without obtaining full details of concerns raised by other professionals. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer for dietetic assessment after considerable weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The deceased had lost a considerable amount of weight but there was no referral to a dietician (although the GP had been consulted regarding her weight loss and had prescribed supplements) The importance of the supplements was not fully appreciated by all of the staff. The deceased’s weight was maintained during a hospital stay but deteriorated on her return to New Park Nursing Home ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to verify correct pressure mattress function

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased’s records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattress management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power source but did not check that the mattress was functioning correctly. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate staff training in pressure mattress management

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased’s records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattress management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power source but did not check that the mattress was functioning correctly. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in referral to Tissue Viability Nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Referral to Tissue Viability nurses should have been done sooner. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate staff training in record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Staff appeared inadequately trained in record keeping. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain continence-related cleanliness before specialist assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The deceased was incontinent and had required cleaning before Tissue Viability Nurses were able to examine her. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor continuity of care staff

    Wider context from the report

    “4. There was poor continuity of staff. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record identified pressure mattress faults

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased’s records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattress management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power source but did not check that the mattress was functioning correctly. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify staff completing care records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record declined interventions

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of nursing staff for Tissue Viability Nurse calls

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of staff to appreciate the importance of prescribed nutritional supplements

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The deceased had lost a considerable amount of weight but there was no referral to a dietician (although the GP had been consulted regarding her weight loss and had prescribed supplements) The importance of the supplements was not fully appreciated by all of the staff. The deceased’s weight was maintained during a hospital stay but deteriorated on her return to New Park Nursing Home ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out pressure sore repositioning plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Stoke-on-Trent City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Falsification of pressure sore repositioning records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share investigation learning with New Park House and recommend improvements to recording practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Some turns had been missed but Mrs Kaiser was known to regularly refuse to comply with the turn regime in place. It was acknowledged that such refusals were not always documented and the home took this away as a recommendation from the investigation for further work with the staff.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation was multi-agency, with social work and safeguarding nursing involvement, rather than a single-agency investigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. Single agency staff investigating Adult Protection Referrals had closed their investigation and recorded the allegations as unsubstantiated without obtaining full details of concerns raised by other professionals.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issues arising after the hospital return were not notified to the City Council, so they were not investigated by it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased’s records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattress management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power source but did not check that the mattress was functioning correctly.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation found that advice and support had been sought from Tissue Viability Nurses through three referrals and assessments in June and July 2014.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The referral to Tissue Viability Nurses should have been made sooner.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation found no evidence that fluid and food records were difficult to interpret or inaccurately recorded.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Records were difficult to interpret and did not accurately record times at which fluid and food had been offered to the deceased. The amounts taken by the deceased were not adequately recorded”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation found no evidence that the pressure-sore management plan was inadequately followed or that records had been falsified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

60%
60%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
35%26%39%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026