Recipient

Swansea Bay University Local Health Board

First report 28 Aug 2013•Latest report 27 Feb 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Local health board. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
29

Naming this recipient

Published responses
66%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
48

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
177

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

66%published responses found
177stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Swansea Bay University Local Health Board linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Howell Glyndwr Fisher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Howell Glyndwr Fisher fell at home, sustained a fractured hip, and later died in hospital on 9 December 2014 after developing an ischemic leg, pneumonia and other health problems. The concerns included at least five falls while he was assessed as being at high risk, insufficient staffing to provide required one-to-one nursing, and inadequate handover and falls-risk assessments between and within hospitals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of transfer handover information about high falls risk

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was no “handover material” at the point of transfer between the two hospitals detailing that he was at high risk of falls and further more on readmission to the Princess of Wales Hospital on the 20th November no falls risk assessment was carried out – indeed, after each successive fall in the Princess of Wales Hospital no formal assessment appears to have been undertaken. Throughout he remained at high risk of falls. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out falls risk assessments on readmission and after successive falls

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was no “handover material” at the point of transfer between the two hospitals detailing that he was at high risk of falls and further more on readmission to the Princess of Wales Hospital on the 20th November no falls risk assessment was carried out – indeed, after each successive fall in the Princess of Wales Hospital no formal assessment appears to have been undertaken. Throughout he remained at high risk of falls. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing for required one-to-one nursing observation of patients at high risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Within the space of a month the deceased had at least 5 falls whilst being deemed as high risk of falls. He was identified as requiring one to one nursing but there were many occasions when insufficient staff numbers meant that this could not be delivered. ”
    Open source report
  2. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Henry Payne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Henry Payne was admitted to hospital after falling at home and fracturing his left neck of femur. While in hospital, he experienced repeated falls, including one that dislocated the repaired hip and necessitated further surgery; the reported concerns included falls despite high-risk assessments and a ward transfer without an apparent transfer document, followed by a fall that was not witnessed. He later developed an infected surgical wound and died on 13 July 2014.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unwitnessed patient falls

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Despite repeated falls risk assessments identifying the deceased as being at high risk of falling he fell on no less than four occasions whilst in hospital which necessitated further surgery as a direct consequence of the fall on the 20th May 2014. (2) He was transferred between wards at 1am in the morning in circumstances in which it appears no transfer document was completed and fell in circumstances in which the fall was not witnessed. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent falls among patients identified as being at high risk of falling

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Despite repeated falls risk assessments identifying the deceased as being at high risk of falling he fell on no less than four occasions whilst in hospital which necessitated further surgery as a direct consequence of the fall on the 20th May 2014. (2) He was transferred between wards at 1am in the morning in circumstances in which it appears no transfer document was completed and fell in circumstances in which the fall was not witnessed. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete transfer documentation between wards

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Despite repeated falls risk assessments identifying the deceased as being at high risk of falling he fell on no less than four occasions whilst in hospital which necessitated further surgery as a direct consequence of the fall on the 20th May 2014. (2) He was transferred between wards at 1am in the morning in circumstances in which it appears no transfer document was completed and fell in circumstances in which the fall was not witnessed. ”
    Open source report
  3. Addressed to “Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board”, a former name of Swansea Bay University Local Health Board.

    Powys, Bridgend & Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Mr. Brian Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Brian Francis was admitted to Princess of Wales Hospital on 5 September 2014 after several days of illness and was treated for presumed chest sepsis. He died of a pulmonary embolism the following day. Concerns included a failed process for recording Consultant attendance and the unavailability of Community medical records, which may have affected assessment and the commencement of anti-coagulation therapy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of paper records to accurately document Consultant patient review

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The process of a Consultant’s attendance on patient being noted by a ‘tick in the box’ on a paper record failed. The box had been ticked when in fact the patient had not been reviewed by the Consultant. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of Community medical records at hospital admission

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Had the Community medical records been available at the time of hospital admission the patient would most probably have been assessed differently and in all probability, anti-coagulation therapy commenced immediately or shortly thereafter. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace tick-box tracking with standardized ED and AMU registers requiring consultant signatures to provide auditable confirmation of patient review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the two entrances there are two registers one in the ED department and one in the AMU department and these are now formatted the same way and require the consultant to sign the register when he/she has seen the patient (Appendix 1). This enables the nursing and medical teams to see quickly who has been reviewed by whom and who has yet to be reviewed. This has replaced the tick box that previously existed; recognising that the ticks could have been entered by anyone and the system could not be reviewed and checked. The enclosed map (Appendix 2) shows the Clinical Decision Unit (now called the Acute Medical Unit) and Emergency Department are next to each other and the medical team works in both areas throughout the 24/7 service.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement ward documentation requiring the senior reviewing clinician to record completion and timing of review for ward staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current arrangements have been reviewed and it is clear that when a patient is admitted the clinical assessment documentation is completed by the admitting doctor. A copy of the document is attached (Appendix 3) and comes as a booklet rather than 8 separate sheets. Page 8 of that document has to be completed by the senior reviewing clinician. This record is sent to the ward with the patient and so ward staff can quickly identify whether senior review has taken place and the time that it took place.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the national Symphony emergency department system across Health Board emergency and assessment units, beginning at specified hospitals in September 2015 and continuing in November 2015.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From September 2015 a new National Emergency Department system (called Symphony) will be implemented within the Emergency Departments and Assessment Units throughout the Health Board. Initially the system will be introduced in Princess of Wales Hospital and Neath Port Talbot Hospitals in September 2015, the first sites in NHS Wales to go live with the new national system. This will be followed by implementation in Morriston and Singleton Hospitals in November 2015.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring the review-tracking system and have the Clinical Director review consultant working practices while supporting development of an electronic system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to monitor the system in place and the Clinical Director will review the working practices of the Consultant Physician body in this regard. The Clinical Director has reinforced to all Consultants that it is vital that they only sign the book after a review has taken place and is monitoring the system. All the teams are aware of this incident and have learned from that. They continue to monitor and review and support the ongoing pilot to develop an electronic system.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce with consultants and nursing staff their responsibilities for authenticating and checking documentation of senior patient review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to monitor the system in place and the Clinical Director will review the working practices of the Consultant Physician body in this regard. The Clinical Director has reinforced to all Consultants that it is vital that they only sign the book after a review has taken place and is monitoring the system. All the teams are aware of this incident and have learned from that. They continue to monitor and review and support the ongoing pilot to develop an electronic system.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pilot a live electronic work list to notify teams about patients requiring review and treatment decisions, with auditable, time-stamped entries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to monitor the system in place and the Clinical Director will review the working practices of the Consultant Physician body in this regard. The Clinical Director has reinforced to all Consultants that it is vital that they only sign the book after a review has taken place and is monitoring the system. All the teams are aware of this incident and have learned from that. They continue to monitor and review and support the ongoing pilot to develop an electronic system.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic community health records cannot be provided locally until national pilot studies are completed and the service is extended to hospital emergency settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A summary of the GP record is currently available in out-of-hours GP services. This national service is currently being extended for use in hospital emergency settings. Pilot projects are already underway in Cardiff and the Vale and Aneurin Bevan Health Boards and our Health Board has already indicated our eagerness to provide this service locally as soon as the pilot studies have been completed.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing clinical assessment documentation and nursing escalation arrangements sufficiently notify ward staff whether senior review has occurred.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current arrangements have been reviewed and it is clear that when a patient is admitted the clinical assessment documentation is completed by the admitting doctor. A copy of the document is attached (Appendix 3) and comes as a booklet rather than 8 separate sheets. Page 8 of that document has to be completed by the senior reviewing clinician. This record is sent to the ward with the patient and so ward staff can quickly identify whether senior review has taken place and the time that it took place.”

    Source location

    2015-0085-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 March 2015

    Open published response
  4. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Terrance O’Connell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Terrance O’Connell was admitted to a care home for respite and later developed abdominal and penile pain with reduced catheter drainage. After a communication breakdown, he was not seen by clinical staff and was found extremely unwell two days later; he was diagnosed with sepsis from a urinary tract infection and died that evening. Concerns included failures in communication, monitoring of oral and urinary output, and clinical assessment, with the inquest conclusion stating that the infection went undiagnosed and untreated before hospital admission and that his condition was contributed to by neglect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between the care home, district nurses and out of hours GP

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was a communication breakdown between the care home, district nurses and out of hours GP on the 3rd May 2013 resulting in Mr O’Connell not being seen by any clinical staff. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely clinical assessment of a patient's condition

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mr O’Connell did not have any clinical assessment of his condition for 2 days until his admission to hospital ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Swansea Bay University Local Health Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of direct monitoring of oral input and urinary output at the care home

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was no direct monitoring of his oral input and urinary output at the care home which would have provided further evidence in support of a urinary tract infection. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a clear out-of-hours escalation process for resolving disputed clinical issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Issue identified: Lack of process in place to escalate the issue re the dispute between the two clinicians.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 10 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement clear, auditable message sheets for out-of-hours district nursing referrals through the Princess of Wales Hospital switchboard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Health Board has implemented a clear and accurate message sheet, SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), for the switchboard staff at the Princess of Wales Hospital to record all of hours requests for District Nurses in greater detail. The SBAR forms will ensure clear, audible records of referrals to the District Nursing Service in the Bridgend Locality, supporting safe, high quality patient care and the ability to review information and audit.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a Bridgend weekend rota of on-duty district nurse mobile telephone numbers for the out-of-hours GP service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The District Nurses in Swansea and Neath Port Talbot Locality currently provide the GP OOH Service with a weekend rota of the District Nurse’s on duty mobile telephone numbers. It is planned that this system will be introduced in October 2013, in Bridgend, once the new 24 hour shift pattern is introduced.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement SBAR referral and handover documentation for district nursing and out-of-hours GP communication, with staff training on its use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Issue identified: Need for clarity in communication with out of hours GP service.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 9 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate reminders to out-of-hours GPs requiring direct discussion with the clinician accepting responsibility for a patient's care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ has written to all the out of hours GP’s to remind them that they must speak directly to the clinician who they wish to involve in the patient’s care and ensure that responsibility has been passed to that person. It has been pointed out that this procedure must be followed at shift changing times and outstanding problems are communicated verbally and directly to the GP coming on shift.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require direct clinician-to-clinician handover of care and verbal communication of outstanding problems during shift changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Clinical Manager for the GP OOH Service has discussed this case on two occasions with nurse management and agreed that in future all handover of care should be made person to person and not via messages left at switchboard.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The district nursing assessment was appropriate because the catheter was draining freely; the patient required medical rather than nursing assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The district nursing staff made an appropriate assessment on the information supplied by the care home i.e. that the catheter was draining freely, and therefore the cause of the pain would not have been a blocked catheter.”

    Source location

    2013-0218-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 7 · response
    Published 28 August 2013

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

66%
66%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
50%18%31%1%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026