Recipient

Sydenham Green Group Practice

Pin Request correction

First report 29 May 2020•Latest report 29 May 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Sydenham Green Group Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Master Omarian Brooks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Omarian Brooks, a severely disabled boy, deteriorated after being given antibiotics by his parents and died en route to hospital on 27 May, without having had a GP visit. Concerns included the GP apparently being unaware of his deterioration, the absence of a protocol for managing it, and the lack of a patient-specific emergency care protocol. The report states that earlier GP awareness might have led to hospital admission with a real prospect of successfully treating the infection.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sydenham Green Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Dispute over hospital destination during ambulance transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was also a distressing dispute between the ambulance crew and parents as to which hospital Omarian should be taken, in the event he was not taken to the nearest hospital at the insistence of his parents (although in this instance the delay was not found to have contributed to the death). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sydenham Green Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform the GP of patient deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Record concludes that had the GP been informed of the boy’s deterioration either 4 days before the antibiotic was started or soon after, he would have been admitted to hospital with a real prospect of the infection being successfully treated. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026