Recipient

Tarmac Trading Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 16 Nov 2020•Latest report 16 Nov 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Tarmac Trading Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Waite · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Waite was riding a pedal cycle on the A20 Ashford Road when he collided with the rear of a stationary convoy of eight tipper trucks, sustaining fatal injuries and dying at the scene on 3 July 2019. The substantive concern was that the trucks had been directed to stop on the road without parking restrictions, coning, or signage to alert other road users, and that no clearway or similar restriction was in place.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Tarmac Trading Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of coning or signage requirements for stopped works vehicles on the A20 Ashford Road

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The A20 Ashford Road has no parking restrictions in force for this stretch of road. A total of 8 tipper lorries had been directed to stop on the A20 Ashford Road, Hollingbourne, close to the Mercure Hotel to await the deployment of motorway works on the M20 Motorway. The evidence at the inquest revealed that there was no requirement for coning or signage that may have alerted other road users to their presence. (2) There is not at present any restriction to parking or a requirement for signage on this section of the road such as a clearway and this is of particular concern. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Tarmac Trading Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of parking restrictions for stopped works vehicles on the A20 Ashford Road

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The A20 Ashford Road has no parking restrictions in force for this stretch of road. A total of 8 tipper lorries had been directed to stop on the A20 Ashford Road, Hollingbourne, close to the Mercure Hotel to await the deployment of motorway works on the M20 Motorway. The evidence at the inquest revealed that there was no requirement for coning or signage that may have alerted other road users to their presence. (2) There is not at present any restriction to parking or a requirement for signage on this section of the road such as a clearway and this is of particular concern. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026