Recipient

The Haven Day Centre (Burnhope)

Pin Request correction

First report 19 Apr 2018•Latest report 19 Apr 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Social-care provider. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The Haven Day Centre (Burnhope) linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Stanley Langdon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stanley Langdon died at Dipton Manor Care Home on 21 May 2017 from complications arising from a periprosthetic left femoral fracture sustained while carers assisted him to climb onto a minibus. The report states that he would not have sustained the fracture if he had been transferred in a wheelchair using the available hydraulic lift. The principal concerns were that services began without an adequate care plan or needs assessment, and that care planning was not based on complete information or agreed with his family, creating a risk of similar accidents and deaths in future.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Haven Day Centre (Burnhope); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to discuss and agree care plans and needs assessments with service users’ families

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The inquest was told in evidence that Durham County Council had systems in place to ensure that service providers such as the Haven Day Care Centre would not be authorised to provide services unless and until they had received a care plan and assessment of needs in relation to any specific service user. (5) The inquest was also told in evidence that the systems referred to in (4) were not being applied consistently, and service providers (specifically Haven Day Care Centre) were still commencing the provision of services to service users without receiving care plans and assessments of need for particular service users. (6) The care plan that was put in place for the deceased at the Haven Day Care Centre after services had begun to be provided to him was not based on all the information that was or should have been available, and that the said care plan had not been discussed and agreed with the deceased’s family (it being noted that the deceased was a dementia sufferer heavily reliant on his family for care from day to day) (7) It appears to me that there is a risk that similar situations as that applying to the deceased may arise in the future, whereby the Haven Day Care Centre may begin to provide services to a service user without having been provided with relevant information in the form of a care plan and needs assessment from Durham County Council, and without having in place their own care plan and needs assessment based on complete information and adequate discussion with a service user’s family (in circumstances where the service user was heavily reliant on the family for care from day to day). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Haven Day Centre (Burnhope); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent application of controls preventing service commencement without a care plan and needs assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The inquest was told in evidence that Durham County Council had systems in place to ensure that service providers such as the Haven Day Care Centre would not be authorised to provide services unless and until they had received a care plan and assessment of needs in relation to any specific service user. (5) The inquest was also told in evidence that the systems referred to in (4) were not being applied consistently, and service providers (specifically Haven Day Care Centre) were still commencing the provision of services to service users without receiving care plans and assessments of need for particular service users. (6) The care plan that was put in place for the deceased at the Haven Day Care Centre after services had begun to be provided to him was not based on all the information that was or should have been available, and that the said care plan had not been discussed and agreed with the deceased’s family (it being noted that the deceased was a dementia sufferer heavily reliant on his family for care from day to day) (7) It appears to me that there is a risk that similar situations as that applying to the deceased may arise in the future, whereby the Haven Day Care Centre may begin to provide services to a service user without having been provided with relevant information in the form of a care plan and needs assessment from Durham County Council, and without having in place their own care plan and needs assessment based on complete information and adequate discussion with a service user’s family (in circumstances where the service user was heavily reliant on the family for care from day to day). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Haven Day Centre (Burnhope); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Care plans and needs assessments failing to incorporate complete available information

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The inquest was told in evidence that Durham County Council had systems in place to ensure that service providers such as the Haven Day Care Centre would not be authorised to provide services unless and until they had received a care plan and assessment of needs in relation to any specific service user. (5) The inquest was also told in evidence that the systems referred to in (4) were not being applied consistently, and service providers (specifically Haven Day Care Centre) were still commencing the provision of services to service users without receiving care plans and assessments of need for particular service users. (6) The care plan that was put in place for the deceased at the Haven Day Care Centre after services had begun to be provided to him was not based on all the information that was or should have been available, and that the said care plan had not been discussed and agreed with the deceased’s family (it being noted that the deceased was a dementia sufferer heavily reliant on his family for care from day to day) (7) It appears to me that there is a risk that similar situations as that applying to the deceased may arise in the future, whereby the Haven Day Care Centre may begin to provide services to a service user without having been provided with relevant information in the form of a care plan and needs assessment from Durham County Council, and without having in place their own care plan and needs assessment based on complete information and adequate discussion with a service user’s family (in circumstances where the service user was heavily reliant on the family for care from day to day). ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026