Recipient

The Hub

Pin Request correction

First report 15 Aug 2017•Latest report 15 Aug 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The Hub linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Leak · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Leak, who had significant disabilities including serious mobility problems, died in a fire at his flat at Honiton Oaks on 5 March 2017. The principal concern was whether tenants with mobility problems or other difficulties escaping a fire should have external monitoring of individual fire alerts, given the building’s ‘Stay Put’ policy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Hub; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of external monitoring of individual fire alert systems for tenants with mobility problems

    Wider context from the report

    “I also heard evidence to the effect that Mr Leak was not the only tenant with mobility problems who resided at Honiton Oaks. In such circumstance, the matter of concern is that in the light of the building’s ‘Stay Put’ policy, consideration should be given in the case of tenants who have particular mobility problems or are otherwise likely to have difficulty in escaping from a fire within the confines of their own flat, to arranging for external monitoring of the individual fire alert systems within those tenants’ flats. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026