Recipient

The Olive School, Small Heath

First report 1 Sep 2017•Latest report 1 Sep 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Academy. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
15

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
15stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from The Olive School, Small Heath linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Mohammad Ismaeel Ashraf · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mohammad Ismaeel Ashraf, a nine-year-old boy with multiple food allergies, suffered an anaphylactic reaction at school after eating lunch and died later that day following unsuccessful resuscitation. Concerns included failures and delays in care plans, ineffective communication about allergy information, unsafe allergy-identification lanyards, and failure to administer his epipen promptly despite his deteriorating condition.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsafe and unreliable lanyard identification of children’s food allergies

    Wider context from the report

    “4. As an interim measure lanyards had been used to try and identify which food children were allergic to when buying their lunch. The Inquest heard how some lanyards were not accurate and lanyards themselves are not as safe as they may be amended or worn by a different pupil. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in issuing care plans for children with allergies

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That there are delays in issuing care plans. Care plans need to be issued quickly where a child has an allergy. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a process for immediately communicating safety recommendations to affected parties

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Immediately following this tragic event, the Local Authority procured a report to look at the safety of food delivery in the school. That report identified a number of matters requiring attention which included identifying that the lanyard system that the school had introduced as an interim measure was not safe. This recommendation and others were not communicated to the school or anyone else, to enable them to make essential changes to processes to ensure the management of children with food allergies was adequate. I am therefore concerned that the local authority has no process in place to ensure that recommendations are immediately communicated to those affected by them so that practices can be changed and processes put in place to rectify the problem. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide issued care plans to the food provider

    Wider context from the report

    “3. All issued care plans had not been provided to Caterlink by the school and communication between the school and Caterlink was not as effective as they could be. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of care plans for all pupils who require them

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That care plans are not in place for all pupils that require them. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that the deceased’s sister’s care plan is still inaccurate, despite this having been identified to the school. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to The Olive School, Small Heath; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That care plans are not in place for all pupils that require them. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that the deceased’s sister’s care plan is still inaccurate, despite this having been identified to the school. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct routine half-term checks comparing displayed and catering-held Health Care Plans with the central master list.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The School has implemented a routine half termly check of all Health Care Plans displayed at key locations and held by the catering teams, which are cross checked against the master list held centrally at the school.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and rectify Health Care Plan inaccuracies, update medical records, and provide signed, dated plans to catering staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The School was very concerned to hear the evidence given by the uncle of the deceased at the inquest that the Health Care Plan for Ismael’s sister was inaccurate. At the time of the inquest the pupils were on the six week summer holiday and so neither pupil nor any other pupils were being put at risk at the time the evidence came to light. The School took immediate steps, before the school re-opened in September 2017, to review and rectify any inaccuracies.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require written, signed medical notifications, promptly refer them to the SENCO and school nurse, and record notification handling.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All notifications made to the School regarding a pupil’s medical condition, including allergies, must be provided by the parent/guardian to the School in writing using the data information sheet. The data information sheet must be signed by a parent/guardian of the pupil and counter signed by the staff member at the School accepting the document. The notification ensures that an accurate record is made of a pupil’s medical condition before a referral is made to the Birmingham Health Care Trust, who will issue a Health Care Plan if required.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a Central Medical Register tracking Health Care Plans, medication, medicine locations, outstanding issues, and incomplete actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The School has established a Central Medical Register which provides instant access to the status of a pupil’s Care Plan, all medication issued to a pupil and the location of the medicine. The Central Medical Register provides instant information to highlight any outstanding issues and the actions that are yet to be completed, including receipt of the Health Care Plan.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request parental updates on pupils’ medical conditions once each term in addition to annual updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The School will continue with its policy, as it has for many years, to send the existing medical details (including allergy details), out to every parent at the end of the school year. The information is sent to the parents for them to check and report back any changes at the start of the new academic year. The School now requests parental updates once a term in addition to the annual requests.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement allergy lunchtime controls requiring daily pre-orders, allergy-specific meal preparation, staff-supervised collection, and documented communication of allergy information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Aside from the monthly meetings the School has implemented a robust system to ensure that the catering staff are notified of any new allergy information as soon as the School is notified. The pupil is added to the pre-order list and a prepared lunch is provided to the pupil by the catering team. The pupil is accompanied to lunch by a member of staff. A record is kept of all notifications made to the catering team. The pupil is issued once a Health Care Plan has been issued by the School, which is signed by both the catering manager and a signed record kept of delivery and receipt of the Health Care Plan to the catering manager.”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 5 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The School does not issue Health Care Plans; responsibility for issuing them rests with the Trust’s school nurse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The School is not responsible for issuing a pupil’s Health Care Plan. The School nurse employed by the Trust is the person responsible for issuing the Health Care Plans. The School immediately informs the School nurse of the pupil’s medical condition. The School nurse will then issue the pupil’s Health Care Plan, within seven days. It is not”

    Source location

    2017-0243-Response-by-Al-Hijrah-School
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
80%7%13%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026