Recipient

Ty Nant Nursing Home

First report 26 Sep 2017•Latest report 26 Sep 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ty Nant Nursing Home linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Hedley Greenland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hedley Greenland, who was residing in a nursing home and had prostate cancer requiring permanent catheterisation, became acutely unwell on 17 December 2016 and died in hospital on 20 December 2016. The inquest concluded that he died from the effects of a urine infection in circumstances where fluid input and catheter output were not adequately monitored for over nine hours. Concerns included the absence of fluid balance monitoring and written handover, inadequate catheter-care training and knowledge, and the absence of evidence that the Catheter Care Bundle was being used.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to flush indwelling catheters when required

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use the Catheter Care Bundle

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was no evidence in the medical/nursing notes that the "Catheter Care Bundle" was being used. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training in male catheterisation

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The qualified nurse on duty overnight 16th/17th December was not trained in male catheterisation. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding, knowledge and training in long-term indwelling catheter management

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The evidence given by two nurses involved in Mr Greenland's care revealed a clear lack of understanding, knowledge and training as to how to manage a long term indwelling catheter. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide written handover to incoming nursing teams

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise and escalate absent urine output

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to actively monitor urine output

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ty Nant Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use fluid balance charts to monitor fluid intake and urine output

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026