Recipient

Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 8 Mar 2021•Latest report 8 Mar 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Adam Joseph Brunskill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adam Joseph Brunskill fell approximately 8 metres through a fragile glass rooflight while working on a warehouse roof and died the following day from a devastating brain injury. Concerns included his lack of prior roofing experience, accredited training and supervision, together with inadequate safety barriers, designated walkways, safety netting, structured training, supervisory arrangements and appraisal systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure new employees have the required roofing experience, qualification and health and safety training

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Coroner heard at inquest that Adam had been employed by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding to work on a roof with no prior experience of working on a roof and no CSCS card nor had he completed a mandatory one-day Health & Safety course; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of designated on-site supervision and practical on-the-job training oversight

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) On day 13/7/20 and 14/7/20 there was no evidence of a designated supervisor responsible for Adam on site and/or responsible for Adam’s practical on the job training; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear designated structured training programme for new and unqualified employees

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any clear designated structured training programme in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding for new and/or unqualified employees; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clearly identifiable supervisory arrangements for new and unqualified employees

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any clearly identifiable supervisor and/or supervisory arrangements in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding for new and/or unqualified employees; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an employee appraisal system

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any appraisal system in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026