Recipient

Whipps Cross University Hospital

Pin Request correction

First report 11 Dec 2020•Latest report 11 Dec 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Whipps Cross University Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Shyama Vadwatee RAMPADARUTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shyama Vadwatee Rampadaruth, who had multiple co-morbidities, became unwell during a routine renal dialysis appointment on 13 April 2020, was later admitted as an emergency, diagnosed with COVID-19 and died three days later. The principal concern was that, after being separated from other patients, she waited for approximately six hours on a hard chair rather than being allowed to return home with family support while awaiting dialysis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Whipps Cross University Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make suitable interim arrangements for a frail patient during prolonged transfer delays

    Wider context from the report

    “However, this meant that Ms Rampadaruth had to wait for approximately six hours on a hard chair in a hospital waiting area. This is clearly sub optimal for the health of a frail, elderly lady with multiple co-morbidities. The patient transfer service is likely to have been busy, but Ms Rampadaruth and her husband lived nearby. Her niece, who was very involved with her care, works locally. A quick call to a family member would have resulted in immediate arrangements being made to collect Ms Rampadaruth, bring her home to sit in comfort with familiar company and her usual food and drink, and then to return her when hospital staff were ready to begin her dialysis. Her general well being could have been so enhanced by just a small change to administrative arrangements. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026