Recipient

Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team

Pin Request correction

First report 12 May 2014•Latest report 12 May 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Keiran Michael John Toman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keiran Michael John Toman had fixed delusions, withdrew from social and psychiatric support, and subsequently starved himself to death due to paranoia before being found deceased in a hotel. The report raised concerns that psychiatric services did not maintain contact with his family despite his lack of insight and capacity, potentially leaving him isolated and increasing the risk of deterioration and death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Isolation of vulnerable patients and increased risk of deterioration and death from lack of family contact

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) That the lack of contact with families in such circumstances may leave vulnerable patients isolated and increase their risk of deterioration and death, as occurred in this case and in others that I have investigated. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient review of patient decisions about permission to contact next of kin or family

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) That permission to contact next of kin/ family decisions taken by patients may not be reviewed often enough by those providing psychiatric care, such that information in relation to changes in treatment, mental state, discharge, provider of care etc may not be being appropriately communicated to the detriment of patients. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appropriately challenge decisions by patients with insufficient insight not to share information with families

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That some psychiatric staff and services may effectively collude with patients by acquiescing to requests not to pass on information to their families, when these decisions are taken by patients who have insufficient insight to make them. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient training of psychiatric staff to assess patients’ capacity to decline contact with next of kin

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) That some psychiatric staff may be insufficiently trained to assess the capacity of patients to decline contact with next of kin and thus the best interest of such patients is compromised. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Windsor and Maidenhead Community Mental Health Team; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to contact family or next of kin when a patient who previously declined contact disengages from psychiatric services

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) That where decisions are taken by psychiatric staff not to contact family in line with a patients wishes in order to try and keep that patient engaged with services, that contact is still not made to the family or next of kin even when such a patient disengages from the psychiatric services. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026