Recipient

Wychall Lane Surgery

First report 15 Jul 2016•Latest report 15 Jul 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
5

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Wychall Lane Surgery linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Sydney Mya Neil · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sydney Mya Neil suffered from severe brittle asthma and died at Birmingham Children's Hospital after collapsing at a GP surgery following breathing difficulties. The report raised concerns about inadequate ventilation, lack of suction and lack of oxygen during resuscitation, and whether GP practices have sufficient expertise and equipment for emergencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wychall Lane Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient resuscitation expertise in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wychall Lane Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate ventilation during resuscitation in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wychall Lane Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient emergency equipment in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wychall Lane Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide oxygen during resuscitation in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Wychall Lane Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use suction during resuscitation in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide defibrillator, oxygen, oximeter and recommended CPR equipment for managing medical emergencies in the practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It suggests agreed principles for defibrillators, oxygen and oximeters (attachment 3). We have these at the practice.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Wychall-Lane-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    GP practices do not need to maintain suction equipment because its use is extremely rare and competence would be difficult to maintain.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have met with Birmingham South Central CCG and after a detailed significant event analysis they have stated:- “All organisations providing primary care should also have appropriate equipment and drugs for managing other life-threatening emergencies (e.g. anaphylaxis). The CCG would expect all staff to be trained to deliver basic CPR to patients, to have this training updated on a regular basis and have appropriate protocols in place to deal with such emergencies. In respect of suction being available, the CCG view would be that there would be no requirement for GP practices to have suction available on a regular basis as the use of such equipment would be extremely rare and it would be difficult for GPs to maintain their competence in using this type of equipment.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Wychall-Lane-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    General practice is not an emergency service and is not contracted, equipped or organised to deliver team-based emergency care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have taken advice from the Local Medical Committee and General Practice Committee (GPC) of the BMA who commissioned ████████ who is a senior GP who has held roles including provision of and teaching of immediate care, now known as Pre-Hospital Emergency Medicine and is chair of BASICS Education Ltd, who aim to improve emergency care outside hospital, to comment on the care the Practice provided to Miss Neil and provide his general thoughts on this incident. He states general practice and general practitioners are not an emergency service…… General practitioners who very, very infrequently have to deal with life threatening emergencies and are neither equipped, contracted nor organised to deliver such team based emergency care.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Wychall-Lane-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026