PFD report

Aaron Antony Lauder · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Jan 2021•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of visibility for drivers at the accident locus
  2. Lack of view available to drivers at the accident location
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Implement a funded visibility-improvement scheme by acquiring land, setting back the hedge and completing the design and works at the farm access.

    Stated by Corserv Solutions LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 February 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    No further response to the other suggested measures is considered necessary because visibility improvement addresses the core safety issue.

    Stated by Corserv Solutions LimitedNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of visibility for drivers at the accident locus

Wider context from the report

“I concluded that the prime cause of the collision was the lack of view available to either driver at the accident locus. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of view available to drivers at the accident location

Wider context from the report

“I concluded that the prime cause of the collision was the lack of view available to either driver at the accident locus. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a funded visibility-improvement scheme by acquiring land, setting back the hedge and completing the design and works at the farm access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cornwall Council has agreed to fund a scheme to improve visibility at the farm access. The highway authority is intending to obtain the relevant land and set back the Cornish hedge, with the landowner’s full cooperation; Cormac’s Safety Engineering team has begun the design process. It is likely that the work will be undertaken in the autumn of this year.”

Source location

2021-0021-Response-from-CORMAC_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 2 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further response to the other suggested measures is considered necessary because visibility improvement addresses the core safety issue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note the other potential suggestions outlined in your Report and thank you for them. There are reasons why these would not be particularly effective or appropriate at this location, but as the visibility improvement gets to the heart of the safety issue, it is probably not necessary to respond to these in any detail here, although I would be happy to discuss them separately if desired.”

Source location

2021-0021-Response-from-CORMAC_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 2 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026