PFD report

Hayley Emma GASCOIGNE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Oct 2018•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of defibrillator availability in court buildings
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable availability and readiness of defibrillators for emergency response
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Install a defibrillator at Hull Combined Court Centre.

    Stated by HM Courts & Tribunals ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 October 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of defibrillator availability in court buildings

Wider context from the report

“Expert evidence was heard that in the presence of a “shockable cardiac dysrhythmia” such as ventricular fibrillation, the administration of a shock from a defibrillator can restore the normal cardiac rhythm and that the longer the application of such a shock is delayed, the greater the likelihood is that the patient will succumb to this untoward cardiac event. A number of public buildings are provided with defibrillation apparatus, but our preliminary enquiries indicate that the Hull Combined Court Centre did not have one at material times. The Independent Accident and Emergency Expert believes that all buildings should be equipped with such an apparatus given that the quicker a shock is applied the greater the probability is that a patient will survive. I would ask you to reply to me within 56 days as to whether the Court Complex now has a defibrillator or whether there are plans in place for such an apparatus to be secured. If there are no plans then I would require you to tell me why this is not being considered given the obvious benefit of having such equipment available in public places. I am copying this report to HM Courts and Tribunals Services to bring the problem of lack of defibrillators in public buildings such as Courts to their attention. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable availability and readiness of defibrillators for emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install a defibrillator at Hull Combined Court Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In respect of actions to be taken, I can confirm that Hull Combined Court Centre now has a defibrillator located on site, and staff have been briefed accordingly.”

Source location

HG-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Brief staff on the on-site defibrillator.

    Stated by HM Courts & Tribunals ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 October 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief staff on the on-site defibrillator.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In respect of actions to be taken, I can confirm that Hull Combined Court Centre now has a defibrillator located on site, and staff have been briefed accordingly.”

Source location

HG-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026