PFD report

Jaroslaw Rogala (otherwise known as Jarek) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Dec 2016•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of inpatient facilities for admitting patients with addiction for care and supervision during crisis
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to appropriate addiction support
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Offer higher-risk consenting patients transfer to the Lotus Psychiatric Decision Unit for up to 48 hours of support, monitoring and extended assessment.

    Stated by South West London and St George'S Mental Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The Trust disputes that addiction-related crisis patients are discriminated against or lack access to a safe place under existing service criteria.

    Stated by South West London and St George'S Mental Health NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of inpatient facilities for admitting patients with addiction for care and supervision during crisis

Wider context from the report

“That those patients with addiction are risk of suicide as there are no in-patient facilities to admit them for care and supervision when in crisis in circumstances as described in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to appropriate addiction support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Offer higher-risk consenting patients transfer to the Lotus Psychiatric Decision Unit for up to 48 hours of support, monitoring and extended assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In fact, with the support of our Commissioners, local services for patients in mental health crisis have improved since the time of Mr Rogala’s contact with our services, and this may provide you with further reassurance. Since November 2016, clinicians working in the Trust’s Emergency and Urgent Mental Health Services (including Liaison Psychiatry and Home Treatment teams) have been able to offer higher risk consenting patients the option of transfer to the Lotus Psychiatric Decision Unit (PDU). The Lotus suite enables patients to be supported and monitored for up to 48 hours in a dedicated safe space at Springfield University Hospital and permits an extended assessment to be undertaken. The outcome of this could indicate a formal admission to an acute psychiatric ward, or some other form of support.”

Source location

2016-0445-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust disputes that addiction-related crisis patients are discriminated against or lack access to a safe place under existing service criteria.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From our consideration of the case and the criteria of existing services we therefore do not believe that patients with an addiction are discriminated against when a co-existing mental health crisis, such as suicidal ideation, is identified. Where significant risk is indicated, the use of the Mental Health Act may also be considered to ensure a patient is conveyed to a place of safety for an assessment even when they are not agreeable. However, the use of the Mental Health Act was not an option in the case of Mr Rogala as his risk was not determined to be high at the time of assessment; he had a primary dependence on alcohol which is an exclusion under the Mental Health Act; and he had capacity to make decisions himself.”

Source location

2016-0445-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing local crisis services provide appropriate assessment, support and potential inpatient admission for patients with addiction and suicidal thoughts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The possibility of a gap in service provision has been considered in the event of the circumstances of the case being different, for example: if Mr Rogala had been assessed as suicidal in the context of alcohol dependence or be requesting admission to hospital. If this had been the case, psychiatric liaison services would have explored a range of options with the aim of the risk of him acting on his thoughts being alleviated. This may have led to a referral to the home treatment service which is able to provide intensive support for people who are suicidal, regardless of the presence of alcohol or any other form of addiction.”

Source location

2016-0445-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clinical commissioning groups are responsible for commissioning the full range of local mental health and substance misuse services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our deepest sympathies are extended to the family and friends of Mr Rogala. The conclusion that we have reached indicates there is no current gap in services that would have prevented him accessing a safe place, and the criteria for accessing crisis support from mental health services do not discriminate against those patients who are in crisis due to the presence of an addiction, other than the statutory exclusions written into the Mental Health Act. In discussion with CCG commissioners who are the responsible body for commissioning a full range of services, including mental health and substance misuse services, the Trust also believes the framework of services within Wandsworth and Merton to be in line with arrangements in other parts of London, and consistent with the overall national picture.”

Source location

2016-0445-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Open two crisis cafés in Wandsworth and Merton as accessible spaces for people experiencing mental health distress.

    Stated by South West London and St George'S Mental Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Open two crisis cafés in Wandsworth and Merton as accessible spaces for people experiencing mental health distress.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Again, the presence of suicidal ideation is the focus of the care plan, and the existence of an addiction, is not an exclusionary factor. You may also wish to know that the Trust is due to open two ‘crisis cafes’ in April 2017 located in Wandsworth and Merton boroughs that will provide open access spaces on high street locations for people in mental health distress.”

Source location

2016-0445-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026