PFD report

Terence Millington · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Mar 2017•South Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Unavailability of the on-call consultant for prompt attendance
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required
  2. Failure of on-call senior doctors to ensure they awaken when telephoned
  3. Failure to correctly fulfil requests for two packs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Provide an emergency epistaxis bag for on-call staff on ward 11 and monitor its availability and contents through monthly health and safety checks.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    On-call doctors must be able to attend within 30 minutes and consultants living farther away must arrange suitable local accommodation while on call.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of the on-call consultant for prompt attendance

Wider context from the report

“It is acknowledged that an incident investigation was undertaken by the Trust at my invitation during the inquest which sets out steps to be taken to prevent a repetition of the contact issue. Nonetheless I believe this report remains necessary so that lessons might be learnt beyond the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust. • That an on-call senior doctor (the SpR) did not make satisfactory arrangements to ensure that she would waken if telephoned. • That the next on-call (the consultant) would have had no opportunity to attend promptly because of the distance from his home. The AA website shows that from the centre of Retford to Weston Park would take over 50 minutes although it is accepted that the consultant may live on the Sheffield side of Retford. For clarity, it is acknowledged that the consultant would not have had time to attend in this case (from when the request was actually made) even if living much closer. • That the request for two packs was not met correctly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of on-call senior doctors to ensure they awaken when telephoned

Wider context from the report

“It is acknowledged that an incident investigation was undertaken by the Trust at my invitation during the inquest which sets out steps to be taken to prevent a repetition of the contact issue. Nonetheless I believe this report remains necessary so that lessons might be learnt beyond the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust. • That an on-call senior doctor (the SpR) did not make satisfactory arrangements to ensure that she would waken if telephoned. • That the next on-call (the consultant) would have had no opportunity to attend promptly because of the distance from his home. The AA website shows that from the centre of Retford to Weston Park would take over 50 minutes although it is accepted that the consultant may live on the Sheffield side of Retford. For clarity, it is acknowledged that the consultant would not have had time to attend in this case (from when the request was actually made) even if living much closer. • That the request for two packs was not met correctly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to correctly fulfil requests for two packs

Wider context from the report

“It is acknowledged that an incident investigation was undertaken by the Trust at my invitation during the inquest which sets out steps to be taken to prevent a repetition of the contact issue. Nonetheless I believe this report remains necessary so that lessons might be learnt beyond the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust. • That an on-call senior doctor (the SpR) did not make satisfactory arrangements to ensure that she would waken if telephoned. • That the next on-call (the consultant) would have had no opportunity to attend promptly because of the distance from his home. The AA website shows that from the centre of Retford to Weston Park would take over 50 minutes although it is accepted that the consultant may live on the Sheffield side of Retford. For clarity, it is acknowledged that the consultant would not have had time to attend in this case (from when the request was actually made) even if living much closer. • That the request for two packs was not met correctly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide an emergency epistaxis bag for on-call staff on ward 11 and monitor its availability and contents through monthly health and safety checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. In response to the issue of the availability of the two nasal packs, an emergency epistaxis bag for on-call medical staff who are required to attend patients elsewhere in the Trust is now available on ward 11 at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital. The availability and the contents of the bag have been incorporated within the monthly health and safety checklist so that this will be regularly monitored.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

On-call doctors must be able to attend within 30 minutes and consultants living farther away must arrange suitable local accommodation while on call.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Regarding the issue of the next on-call doctor (the consultant) and the distance from his home to the hospital, an investigation of the case of this specific consultant is being undertaken by ████████ the Trust’s Medical Director. The requirement is for on-call medical staff to be able to attend the hospital within 30 minutes and, whilst there are a number of consultants who live more than 30 minutes away from the hospital, they are required to make arrangements to stay locally at a location which meets the ’30-minute requirement’ when on call.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Incorporate non-resident on-call contactability responsibilities into the central medical staff induction programme.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  2. 2

    Include non-resident on-call contactability responsibilities in local ENT induction.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  3. 3

    Present the incident and outlined actions to the Trust Safety and Risk Management Board for wider learning.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  4. 4

    Review and amend on-call-from-home requirements to register primary and alternative contact numbers with switchboard.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Contactability concerns do not apply to junior doctors working resident out-of-hours shifts because they remain onsite in the relevant clinical area.

    Stated by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate non-resident on-call contactability responsibilities into the central medical staff induction programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From 1 April 2017 the local induction within ENT has included reference to the responsibility of non-resident on-call medical staff to remain contactable and, over the coming months, this is also to be incorporated within the central induction programme for medical staff.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include non-resident on-call contactability responsibilities in local ENT induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From 1 April 2017 the local induction within ENT has included reference to the responsibility of non-resident on-call medical staff to remain contactable and, over the coming months, this is also to be incorporated within the central induction programme for medical staff.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the incident and outlined actions to the Trust Safety and Risk Management Board for wider learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to ensure wider learning, the incident and the actions outlined above are to be presented at the Trust’s Safety and Risk Management Board meeting on 24 May 2017.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and amend on-call-from-home requirements to register primary and alternative contact numbers with switchboard.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, we are in the process of reviewing and amending the Trust’s requirements for staff who are on call from home to ensure that both a primary and an alternative contact number are registered with switchboard. We expect this to be completed by the end of July 2017.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contactability concerns do not apply to junior doctors working resident out-of-hours shifts because they remain onsite in the relevant clinical area.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to the issue of contacting medical staff overnight and at weekends, it is important to note that increasing numbers of junior doctors, particularly in the more acute specialties, work resident shifts out of hours rather than being on-call from home. For these doctors, problems relating to contact are not of concern as they remain on site and in the relevant clinical area throughout the out of hours duty period.”

Source location

2017-0035-Response-by-Sheffield-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026