PFD report

Caitlynn Bethany Jane Bennet and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Sep 2013•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of NNUs to share best practice for limiting cardiac tamponade risk
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable dissemination of safety-critical clinical guidance and learning
  2. Lack of awareness that cardiac tamponade is not a rare complication of TPN feeding
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of NNUs to share best practice for limiting cardiac tamponade risk

Wider context from the report

“(1) NNU staff are not aware that cardiac tamponade may not be such a rare complication of TPN feeding as is thought. (2) NNUs may not be sharing best practice to limit this complication. This is the second Report that I am sending out in relation to an issue about babies dying of cardiac tamponade as a complication of central lines being put in for parenteral nutrition. I have now heard the evidence in relation to the third death and I am sufficiently concerned to write a further report. For everybody’s information, the first report was sent to Sir David Nicholson, Chief Executive of the National Health Service and it must have been forwarded onto The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists by The National Health Services. The response from the Royal College stated that this was not a matter for them but it is a matter for the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. In the meantime, matters have overtaken that and I have heard the Inquest in relation to the third death. I had asked for a report from a Senior Consultant Neonatologist, ████████ who has written me a report indicating essentially, that she has no concern about links between the three cases and that it is a known complication. I am aware that this doctor has now retired. In the third case that I heard of Alfie-Scott Harris, I have found that there were failures in relation to the placement of the end of the long line that he had in, although I did not find these to be gross, and, despite ████████ report, at the very least, it seems to me, that it should not be assumed that this is a rare complication. I have heard that City Hospital have brought in new measures to reduce the incidence of any failures in the future, (for instance having a high resolution x-ray scanning equipment on the Neonatal Unit as well as in Radiology, so that the clinicians can look at the x-rays. I refer to my summing up which is attached to this document). I am concerned that each Unit may not be sharing best practice about what is being done to minimise any risk. I am very conscious that this is a complicated medical issue which I have heard in some detail but you, as a clinician, will no doubt be aware of significant medical research that assists with clinical decision making about care of these lines. However, from my point of view, the first Inquest I heard in relation to this type of death was one where I was told that this was a complication which was incredibly rare. I am also told in the last Inquest of Alfie-Scott Harris, that there have lessons that have been learned and that changes have been made. I am not assured that any changes that have been made in one unit, had not been at least considered in another unit in relation to the same facts. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable dissemination of safety-critical clinical guidance and learning.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness that cardiac tamponade is not a rare complication of TPN feeding

Wider context from the report

“(1) NNU staff are not aware that cardiac tamponade may not be such a rare complication of TPN feeding as is thought. (2) NNUs may not be sharing best practice to limit this complication. This is the second Report that I am sending out in relation to an issue about babies dying of cardiac tamponade as a complication of central lines being put in for parenteral nutrition. I have now heard the evidence in relation to the third death and I am sufficiently concerned to write a further report. For everybody’s information, the first report was sent to Sir David Nicholson, Chief Executive of the National Health Service and it must have been forwarded onto The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists by The National Health Services. The response from the Royal College stated that this was not a matter for them but it is a matter for the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. In the meantime, matters have overtaken that and I have heard the Inquest in relation to the third death. I had asked for a report from a Senior Consultant Neonatologist, ████████ who has written me a report indicating essentially, that she has no concern about links between the three cases and that it is a known complication. I am aware that this doctor has now retired. In the third case that I heard of Alfie-Scott Harris, I have found that there were failures in relation to the placement of the end of the long line that he had in, although I did not find these to be gross, and, despite ████████ report, at the very least, it seems to me, that it should not be assumed that this is a rare complication. I have heard that City Hospital have brought in new measures to reduce the incidence of any failures in the future, (for instance having a high resolution x-ray scanning equipment on the Neonatal Unit as well as in Radiology, so that the clinicians can look at the x-rays. I refer to my summing up which is attached to this document). I am concerned that each Unit may not be sharing best practice about what is being done to minimise any risk. I am very conscious that this is a complicated medical issue which I have heard in some detail but you, as a clinician, will no doubt be aware of significant medical research that assists with clinical decision making about care of these lines. However, from my point of view, the first Inquest I heard in relation to this type of death was one where I was told that this was a complication which was incredibly rare. I am also told in the last Inquest of Alfie-Scott Harris, that there have lessons that have been learned and that changes have been made. I am not assured that any changes that have been made in one unit, had not been at least considered in another unit in relation to the same facts. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.