PFD report

Mrs Lynn Hadley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Jan 2021•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of user knowledge of oxygen-cylinder ignition mechanisms and their ramifications
  2. Risk of ignition within oxygen-cylinder valve components
  3. Failure to follow the safe valve-opening sequence for oxygen regulators
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for oxygen-related fire risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Use HSE communication channels and stakeholder networks to disseminate MHRA information or guidance on safe oxygen-cylinder use.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Consider whether HSE should take further action, including updating oxygen-cylinder safety guidance to reflect new MHRA information or guidance.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 October 2021.
  3. Action

    Make all frontline staff aware of medical-gas-cylinder assembly and disassembly requirements, adiabatic compression, and particle-impact risks.

    Stated by West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 October 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    The regulator cannot issue oxygen safety guidance because it lacks clinical expertise and access to necessary specialist expertise.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of user knowledge of oxygen-cylinder ignition mechanisms and their ramifications

Wider context from the report

“4. Evidence from the Fire Investigation Officer, confirmed that there was little if any knowledge of either adiabatic compression or particle impact and the ramifications of such an event when opening a cylinder incorrectly by those responsible for using the equipment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of ignition within oxygen-cylinder valve components

Wider context from the report

“5. Evidence from the MHRA confirmed that they are aware of four cases of ignition within valve components of oxygen cylinders leading to fire since 2011 including this incident. The valve manufacturer VTI, Germany has subsequently reported nine cases of ignition. VTI are also examining a further 20 regulators. At present no defects have been found. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow the safe valve-opening sequence for oxygen regulators

Wider context from the report

“2. Although both of these phenomena are extremely rare, the sudden uncontrolled release of oxygen by rapidly opening the on/off valve of the regulator can expedite the occurrence of ignition. 3. Evidence from the paramedic confirmed that she opened the patient valve first before opening the on/off valve, thus increasing the chance of the reported phenomena occurring. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for oxygen-related fire risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use HSE communication channels and stakeholder networks to disseminate MHRA information or guidance on safe oxygen-cylinder use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once completed, we will:”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-Health-and-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider whether HSE should take further action, including updating oxygen-cylinder safety guidance to reflect new MHRA information or guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once completed, we will:”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-Health-and-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make all frontline staff aware of medical-gas-cylinder assembly and disassembly requirements, adiabatic compression, and particle-impact risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: WMAS took immediate action as detailed during the Inquest. All frontline WMAS staff were swiftly made aware of the specific requirements for assembly/disassembly of all medical gas cylinders, awareness of adiabatic compression and particle impact, and furthermore a great deal of input went into sharing lessons learned widely throughout partner organisations. The table below provides a summary/timeline of action taken.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage additional professional, healthcare and emergency-service organisations to shape and disseminate oxygen-cylinder ignition and fire-safety messaging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe the MHRA is best placed to take specific leadership action in relation to the risk of incidents which can lead to ignition and fire in the context of oxygen cylinders. We will firstly engage with all the professional organisations who are the most likely to be involved in the administration of oxygen. Their members will be involved in the key stages of setting up of oxygen cylinders and accessory devices (required for the administration to a patient) and the monitoring of the progress of the patient when this has begun. It is hoped, in their professional leadership roles, they will be able to understand and shape the final messages needed to effect culture change amongst their membership, with our assistance where it is within our remit.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-MHRA_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue engaging the Association of Anaesthetists and Royal College of Anaesthetists on oxygen-cylinder ignition and fire-safety messaging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe the MHRA is best placed to take specific leadership action in relation to the risk of incidents which can lead to ignition and fire in the context of oxygen cylinders. We will firstly engage with all the professional organisations who are the most likely to be involved in the administration of oxygen. Their members will be involved in the key stages of setting up of oxygen cylinders and accessory devices (required for the administration to a patient) and the monitoring of the progress of the patient when this has begun. It is hoped, in their professional leadership roles, they will be able to understand and shape the final messages needed to effect culture change amongst their membership, with our assistance where it is within our remit.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-MHRA_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The regulator cannot issue oxygen safety guidance because it lacks clinical expertise and access to necessary specialist expertise.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a regulator it is unfortunately outside of the CQC's remit to issue or change formal guidance or policies around oxygen usage or safety. We are not clinical experts on oxygen cylinders or have access to the expertise which would be necessary in order to issue safety guidance. This role is more suited to the MHRA and HSE from whom I am aware separate responses will be sent to you.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issuing or changing formal guidance or policies on oxygen use and safety is outside the regulator’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. ‘All agencies involved may wish to consider reviewing and issuing guidance for the operation and use of oxygen cylinders.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for issuing oxygen safety guidance lies with the MHRA and HSE.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a regulator it is unfortunately outside of the CQC's remit to issue or change formal guidance or policies around oxygen usage or safety. We are not clinical experts on oxygen cylinders or have access to the expertise which would be necessary in order to issue safety guidance. This role is more suited to the MHRA and HSE from whom I am aware separate responses will be sent to you.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is premature for HSE to consider action before MHRA’s investigative and regulatory work is completed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE continues to support MHRA and we believe it would be premature for us to consider taking any action before their work is completed.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-Health-and-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

MHRA is the lead authority and regulator for the equipment involved, so it leads the relevant investigation and regulatory action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“MHRA are the lead authority, as they are the regulator for the equipment involved in this incident. However, during the investigation a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), comprising the Care Quality Commission, West Midlands Ambulance Service, West Midlands Fire Service, MHRA, Medical Gas Solutions and HSE, was established to:”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-Health-and-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issuing guidance on oxygen-cylinder operation and use is outside the respondent’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issuing of guidance is not within the remit of the MHRA, however, we are able to provide a degree of leadership as the Agency which had primacy in the latter stages of the investigation of this incident.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-MHRA_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue monthly meetings with WMAS to discuss staff training and incidents.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 October 2021.
  2. 2

    Continue monitoring WMAS actions to improve safety.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 October 2021.
  3. 3

    Share lessons learned from the incident widely with partner organisations.

    Stated by West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 October 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Regulating oxygen and medical-gas use in private households is outside the regulator’s remit.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monthly meetings with WMAS to discuss staff training and incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• CQC continue to communicate regularly with WMAS formally in monthly meetings, where staff training and incidents are discussed.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring WMAS actions to improve safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to monitor the actions taken by WMAS to improve safety.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share lessons learned from the incident widely with partner organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: WMAS took immediate action as detailed during the Inquest. All frontline WMAS staff were swiftly made aware of the specific requirements for assembly/disassembly of all medical gas cylinders, awareness of adiabatic compression and particle impact, and furthermore a great deal of input went into sharing lessons learned widely throughout partner organisations. The table below provides a summary/timeline of action taken.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Regulating oxygen and medical-gas use in private households is outside the regulator’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As stated earlier the CQC do not have a remit to regulate the use of oxygen and medical gases in private households.”

Source location

2021-0346-Response-from-CQC_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 18 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026