David Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Feb 2021•Oxfordshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Danger of drivers failing to notice the roundabout in sufficient time

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Oxfordshire County Council

    Extend the 40 mph speed limit, introduce a 50 mph transition buffer, and improve speed-limit sign conspicuity with reflective yellow backing boards.

  2. Oxfordshire County Council

    Remove the short third approach lane by painting hatched lines, reducing the approach to two lanes.

  3. Oxfordshire County Council

    Consider installing additional painted speed-limit roundels on the lanes approaching the roundabout.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Oxfordshire County Council

    No amendments to the roundabout’s physical design were considered necessary because road safety audits identified no design issues.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.
  2. Oxfordshire County Council

    Yellow bar markings cannot be used at this location because the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 guidance criteria are not met.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Danger of drivers failing to notice the roundabout in sufficient time

Wider context from the report

“(1) It will be seen from paragraph 18 of ████████ statement that a few days after this tragic accident there were amendments in the form of a reduction in the speed limit on approach to the roundabout. I understand these amendments were likely to be the result of a review which took place after a double fatality in June 2019. I am concerned that despite improved signage and reduced speed limits there is still the danger of drivers not noticing the roundabout in sufficient time. Importantly, it is noticed that the roundabout is approached from around a bend or deflection. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend the 40 mph speed limit, introduce a 50 mph transition buffer, and improve speed-limit sign conspicuity with reflective yellow backing boards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the incident the existing 40 mph limit has been extended along with a 50 mph limit introduced as a buffer transitioning between the national speed limit and 40 mph limit. As part of this work all speed limit signs were made more conspicuous using reflective yellow backing boards.”

Source location

2021-0173-Response-from-Oxfordshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove the short third approach lane by painting hatched lines, reducing the approach to two lanes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the speed limit on the approach to the roundabout. In addition to this, it is proposed to remove the short third lane by painting hatched lines on it. This will reduce the approach to two lanes but should have minimal impact on the northbound capacity of the roundabout.”

Source location

2021-0173-Response-from-Oxfordshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider installing additional painted speed-limit roundels on the lanes approaching the roundabout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of yellow bar markings as a visual deterrent was mentioned by Mr Wilson during the inquest and was subsequently referred to in the Regulation 28 report. This has been considered but unfortunately, due to the guidance for use criteria within the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, yellow markings would not be appropriate at this location. However, consideration will be given to additional painted speed limit roundels on the lanes approaching the roundabout. These will serve as an even greater visual reminder of”

Source location

2021-0173-Response-from-Oxfordshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No amendments to the roundabout’s physical design were considered necessary because road safety audits identified no design issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Vendee Drive A41 roundabout is of a typical design and similar to many roundabouts across England. In order to encourage vehicles to reduce their speed before entering the lanes on the roundabout, a slight curve is built into the approach lanes. Road Safety audits were carried out throughout the project, these being on the design, once constructed, and after it had been operational for a short period. No design issues were identified at any stage and, as such, no proposals to amend the constructed physical build of the roundabout were identified.”

Source location

2021-0173-Response-from-Oxfordshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Yellow bar markings cannot be used at this location because the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 guidance criteria are not met.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of yellow bar markings as a visual deterrent was mentioned by Mr Wilson during the inquest and was subsequently referred to in the Regulation 28 report. This has been considered but unfortunately, due to the guidance for use criteria within the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, yellow markings would not be appropriate at this location. However, consideration will be given to additional painted speed limit roundels on the lanes approaching the roundabout. These will serve as an even greater visual reminder of”

Source location

2021-0173-Response-from-Oxfordshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026