PFD report

Annette Jane Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Jan 2020•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of fencing to protect the public from falling over the cliff edge at Tennyson Down
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas
  2. Lack of suicide-prevention signage providing the Samaritans telephone number at Tennyson Down
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide accessible suicide-prevention service information to people at riskPart of recurring concern: Inadequate suicide-prevention signage at public locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Conduct site visits at Culver and Tennyson Downs with the Isle of Wight Suicide Prevention and Intervention team.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  2. Action

    Conduct a full internal review of suicide-prevention measures after completing the planned stakeholder meetings.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Fencing the several miles of coastline is not economically viable or aesthetically appropriate.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of fencing to protect the public from falling over the cliff edge at Tennyson Down

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard evidence from ████████ that there are no fences to protect the public from falling over the edge of the cliff at Tennyson Down, and moreover that there are no signs providing those in some sort of mental distress with the number for the Samaritans. Whilst I acknowledge that putting fences around the edge of the cliff would be a massive undertaking by the landowners, it may prevent a future death if those who are in extremes are reminded that there are people out there who are trained to assist them at that time. 2. Having just concluded a similar inquest involving a woman who threw herself from the top of Culver Cliff where I raised similar concerns with both the National Trust and the Director of Public Health who heads up the Suicide Prevention Group on the Isle of Wight, it seems appropriate that if consideration is being given by these organisations to better signage being implemented at the top of Culver Cliff, at the same time, consideration can also be given to making similar improvements at Tennyson Down. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of suicide-prevention signage providing the Samaritans telephone number at Tennyson Down

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard evidence from ████████ that there are no fences to protect the public from falling over the edge of the cliff at Tennyson Down, and moreover that there are no signs providing those in some sort of mental distress with the number for the Samaritans. Whilst I acknowledge that putting fences around the edge of the cliff would be a massive undertaking by the landowners, it may prevent a future death if those who are in extremes are reminded that there are people out there who are trained to assist them at that time. 2. Having just concluded a similar inquest involving a woman who threw herself from the top of Culver Cliff where I raised similar concerns with both the National Trust and the Director of Public Health who heads up the Suicide Prevention Group on the Isle of Wight, it seems appropriate that if consideration is being given by these organisations to better signage being implemented at the top of Culver Cliff, at the same time, consideration can also be given to making similar improvements at Tennyson Down. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide accessible suicide-prevention service information to people at risk; Inadequate suicide-prevention signage at public locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct site visits at Culver and Tennyson Downs with the Isle of Wight Suicide Prevention and Intervention team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Engagement with the Suicide Prevention & Intervention, Isle of Wight team. A meeting with ████████ from the group has been scheduled for Friday 3rd April 2020 to conduct site visits to both Culver and Tennyson Downs.”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a full internal review of suicide-prevention measures after completing the planned stakeholder meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Conduct a full internal review of our suicide prevention measures. Once all the above meetings are complete, we will conduct a full review of our measures and implement changes where appropriate.”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fencing the several miles of coastline is not economically viable or aesthetically appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that a number of measures were already in place at Culver Down, including a total of seven Samaritans signs placed within the past few years. A schematic showing the locations of these signs is at Annex A. In addition, ‘dragons teeth’ (wooden bollards to prevent vehicle access) are in place opposite the exits from the car park and there is a ditch to ground vehicles approaching the cliff edge. There is also a barbed wire fence running the”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Seek police advice and guidance on suicide prevention measures through the Countryside Manager.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  2. 2

    Meet with the Public Health Principal to discuss applying the island-wide Suicide Prevention Plan to National Trust land and supporting it.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  3. 3

    Engage the Isle of Wight Samaritans through participation in the scheduled suicide-prevention site visits.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  4. 4

    Obtain best-practice feedback from National Trust South Downs and White Cliffs teams and use their continuing support while assessing suitable measures.

    Stated by National Trust – Isle of WightStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek police advice and guidance on suicide prevention measures through the Countryside Manager.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Engagement with the Police. To seek advice and guidance. Countryside Manager to speak to ████████”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with the Public Health Principal to discuss applying the island-wide Suicide Prevention Plan to National Trust land and supporting it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Engagement with Public Health Principal: Health and Wellbeing – ████████ ████████ We are due to have a meeting on Wednesday 18th March in advance of meeting with the groups listed below to discuss the island-wide Suicide Prevention Plan, how this might apply specifically to our land and how we can best support it.”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage the Isle of Wight Samaritans through participation in the scheduled suicide-prevention site visits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Engagement with the IOW Samaritans. ████████ is also due to attend the meeting listed above on 3rd April.”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain best-practice feedback from National Trust South Downs and White Cliffs teams and use their continuing support while assessing suitable measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Sought feedback from the National Trust South Downs and White Cliffs teams. Regarding best practice and to learn from their experience. We have received detailed feedback from these teams and have their continued support whilst assessing what measures may or may not be suitable.”

Source location

2020-0004-Response-from-the-Isle-of-Wight-National-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026