PFD report

Jack Matthew Shields · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Mar 2025•Sunderland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to recognise patient deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
  2. Failure to correctly categorise and request the required priority of paramedic backup
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable categorisation and escalation of paramedic backup requests
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Circulate information to staff on available backup categories and the appropriateness of each.

    Stated by The Nerams GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Refresh ECG-reading competency for all non-registered Healthcare Professionals through assessment and continuing professional development.

    Stated by The Nerams GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise patient deterioration

Wider context from the report

“The evidence was clear that Jack’s condition at the time of the first ambulance arrival at 00:36am was such that a higher priority backup should have been requested. Jack was symptomatic of cardiogenic shock with descending blood pressures, shortness of breath, nausea and vomiting, and required the highest priority backup of Cat 1 (Peri Arrest). I am concerned that the crew should have recognised the deteriorating condition when considering relevant observations such as ECG interpretation, an early recognition of such a deterioration and a correct categorisation of a backup request may have led to rapid stabilisation and transportation to definitive care. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to correctly categorise and request the required priority of paramedic backup

Wider context from the report

“The evidence was clear that Jack’s condition at the time of the first ambulance arrival at 00:36am was such that a higher priority backup should have been requested. Jack was symptomatic of cardiogenic shock with descending blood pressures, shortness of breath, nausea and vomiting, and required the highest priority backup of Cat 1 (Peri Arrest). I am concerned that the crew should have recognised the deteriorating condition when considering relevant observations such as ECG interpretation, an early recognition of such a deterioration and a correct categorisation of a backup request may have led to rapid stabilisation and transportation to definitive care. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable categorisation and escalation of paramedic backup requests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate information to staff on available backup categories and the appropriateness of each.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Lessons learned were identified throughout the course of the investigation, immediate mitigation to ensure that all non-registered Healthcare Professionals who read 12 lead ECGs have refreshed competency through assessment and CPD has been implemented as well as information circulated to all staff to highlight the various categories of backup available as well as the appropriateness of each.”

Source location

Response from The Nerams Group
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh ECG-reading competency for all non-registered Healthcare Professionals through assessment and continuing professional development.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Lessons learned were identified throughout the course of the investigation, immediate mitigation to ensure that all non-registered Healthcare Professionals who read 12 lead ECGs have refreshed competency through assessment and CPD has been implemented as well as information circulated to all staff to highlight the various categories of backup available as well as the appropriateness of each.”

Source location

Response from The Nerams Group
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Submit statutory notifications to the Care Quality Commission following incident investigations.

    Stated by The Nerams GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2025.
  2. 2

    Refer relevant former employees to the Northeast Ambulance Service for monitoring of potential work on its contracts.

    Stated by The Nerams GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit statutory notifications to the Care Quality Commission following incident investigations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Appropriate referrals to both the Northeast Ambulance Service to allow them to monitor his ongoing employment on their contracts should he attempt to apply for them or work for a different company as well as statutory notifications to the CQC were made immediately following this incident investigation.”

Source location

Response from The Nerams Group
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer relevant former employees to the Northeast Ambulance Service for monitoring of potential work on its contracts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Appropriate referrals to both the Northeast Ambulance Service to allow them to monitor his ongoing employment on their contracts should he attempt to apply for them or work for a different company as well as statutory notifications to the CQC were made immediately following this incident investigation.”

Source location

Response from The Nerams Group
Page 1 · response
Published 7 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026