Charles Ernest Rayner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Oct 2015•County Durham and Darlington

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of appropriate signage prohibiting right turns
  2. Lack of a westbound slip road or deceleration lane at the crossover point
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe road design and layout

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. National Highways

    Stop up the gated moorland access to remove westbound right-turn manoeuvres from the A66.

  2. National Highways

    Examine collision circumstances and records in the vicinity of Vale House Farm.

  3. National Highways

    Inspect and assess the A66 road layout at Vale House Farm.

  4. National Highways

    Submit a funding bid for the proposed safety work.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. National Highways

    The proposed work cannot currently be undertaken because funding is unavailable; funding must first be secured through a priority-based bid.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. National Highways

    Improvement of the alternative moorland access is contingent on reaching agreement with the landowner.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate signage prohibiting right turns

Wider context from the report

“2) There is no prohibition on a right turn by way of appropriate signage. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a westbound slip road or deceleration lane at the crossover point

Wider context from the report

“1) The crossover point between the Otter Trust and access road to the moors, traveling West, does not have a slip road/deceleration lane for traffic travelling west such that to carry out the turn it is necessary to reduce speed to a virtual standstill in the outside lane. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe road design and layout.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Stop up the gated moorland access to remove westbound right-turn manoeuvres from the A66.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a review of the arrangement of the A66 in the vicinity of Vale House Farm, Highways England has determined that the most suitable approach to reduce future collision risk and improve road user safety is to stop up the gated access to the moorland, thus removing the need for future right turn manoeuvres to be made from the A66 westbound carriageway. Work is also proposed to improve an alternative access to the moorland that is located 380m west of Vale House Farm, subject to agreement with the landowner.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine collision circumstances and records in the vicinity of Vale House Farm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of the Report, a detailed examination of the circumstances of this and other collisions recorded in the vicinity of this location has taken place, and a detailed inspection and assessment of the road’s layout has been undertaken.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect and assess the A66 road layout at Vale House Farm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of the Report, a detailed examination of the circumstances of this and other collisions recorded in the vicinity of this location has taken place, and a detailed inspection and assessment of the road’s layout has been undertaken.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit a funding bid for the proposed safety work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regrettably at this time, no funding is available to undertake this work. A bid will be placed to secure funding, which is normally allocated on a priority basis to ensure that funds are targeted at sites that are likely to provide the greatest collision savings and safety benefit to road users.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The proposed work cannot currently be undertaken because funding is unavailable; funding must first be secured through a priority-based bid.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regrettably at this time, no funding is available to undertake this work. A bid will be placed to secure funding, which is normally allocated on a priority basis to ensure that funds are targeted at sites that are likely to provide the greatest collision savings and safety benefit to road users.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 2 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improvement of the alternative moorland access is contingent on reaching agreement with the landowner.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a review of the arrangement of the A66 in the vicinity of Vale House Farm, Highways England has determined that the most suitable approach to reduce future collision risk and improve road user safety is to stop up the gated access to the moorland, thus removing the need for future right turn manoeuvres to be made from the A66 westbound carriageway. Work is also proposed to improve an alternative access to the moorland that is located 380m west of Vale House Farm, subject to agreement with the landowner.”

Source location

2015-0367-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 1 October 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026