PFD report

Amina Ahmed Ismail · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Jun 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. National scarcity of specialist personality-disorder rehabilitation beds
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient psychiatric inpatient bed capacity
  2. Variation in admission criteria and exclusions across specialist personality-disorder rehabilitation units
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care
  3. Underfunding of local mental health beds
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient mental health service capacity for timely patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Require each Integrated Care Board to develop and publish a three-year plan to localise and realign mental health inpatient care.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Provide £42 million recurrent funding to Integrated Care Boards to support delivery of localised and realigned inpatient care.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Run the Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Inpatient Quality Transformation Programme to localise and realign inpatient care.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Integrated care boards are responsible for developing three-year plans to localise and realign inpatient mental health care, including independent-sector provision.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National scarcity of specialist personality-disorder rehabilitation beds

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient psychiatric inpatient bed capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Variation in admission criteria and exclusions across specialist personality-disorder rehabilitation units

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Underfunding of local mental health beds

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient mental health service capacity for timely patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Over-reliance by the NHS on independent mental health-bed providers

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe reliance on independent providers for NHS mental health beds.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in transferring patients from out-of-area independent-provider hospitals

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Out-of-area mental health placements failing to provide effective continuity of care and support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Funding allocation failing to secure available specialist rehabilitation beds for identified patients

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care; Insufficient psychiatric inpatient bed capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Home teams’ inability to commission or make funding decisions for specialist personality-disorder placements

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in funding approval for specialist rehabilitation beds

Wider context from the report

“This is now the third inquest (two within the past 8 months) I have heard where the delayed transfer of an out-of-area patient from an independent provider’s hospital has been a contributory factor in that patient’s death. Two of those cases involving prolonged stays on PICU units; in this case some 13 months and in the other, some 11 months. These cases illustrate, a) Underfunding for local mental health beds. It took some 6 weeks in 2022 to transfer Amina from the PD specialist placement at Nield House (where the treating team felt that they could not keep Amina safe) to a PICU some 90 miles from home. Further, there were no local PICU beds available for transfer out of The Priory, Cheadle in May/June/July 2023 when a PD placement could not be found. b) An over-reliance by the NHS on independent providers for mental health beds whether general acute beds, PICU beds or specialist units. c) A national scarcity of specialist PD rehabilitation units The inquest heard evidence from two treating psychiatrists in Amina’s history (Nield House and The Priory), FTB PACT assessor, and the court appointed independent expert that there was, and is, a national shortage of specialist PD rehabilitation units/beds, paraphrasing, ‘rehabilitation beds for female patients with PD are limited – demand exceeding what is available nationally’. ‘shortage of rehabilitation placements nationally – impeding on young persons’ mental health treatments’ ‘simply not enough beds (NHS or Independent) to cater for such complex patients as Amina – transfers not being accepted by such units even if not full because the acuity of their existing patients’. ‘PD rehabilitation beds are scarce – spread nationally often in isolated units far from home, family and the local/home team. Each having its own admission criteria/exclusions, such as the possible need for NGT feeding’. Following the PACT assessment FTB, in early 2023, were only able to find two PD units that had a bed available. One of them, Eleanor House, was re-opening its doors having voluntarily closed at the end of 2022. It had 14 beds available. However, its extant CQC rating was overall inadequate and it was in the process of appealing a Notice of Decision. The other, Cygnet Alders, declined the referral. Three other units were identified as possibilities but each declined a referral, without any assessment, based on the acuity of their own patients. Just 5 beds available over a period 6-7months, before Fern Unit accepted Amina. In the meantime Amina remained in a PICU, some 90 miles from home which was wholly unsuited to her presentation and unable (through no fault of its own) to deliver the care and therapy that she needed resulting in a deterioration in her mental state with increasing risks/incidents of self-harm. d) A funding process for rehabilitation units that is not fit for purpose. The inquest heard evidence about the funding set-up for secondary mental health care in the Birmingham area, which is replicated nationally. The ICB commissioned FTB to provide secondary mental health services, both community and in-patient. FTB are able to commission NHS and independent sector acute beds and PICU’s, both in and out of area. However, FTB are not able to commission specialist placement, including PD units. These are commissioned/funded directly by the ICB upon application by the FTB; having found a unit that would accept a patient. This system, for funding specialist/rehabilitation beds, is inadequate; particularly in light of the shortage of such specialist/rehabilitation beds. The inquest heard evidence that the process from application to funding approval takes weeks, sometimes months. In this case it took from 13.03.23 to 04.05.23 for a negative outcome. The shortage of beds/units means that when a bed becomes available there are a number of patients in competition for it. The beds are not kept open for any particular patient and, in essence, allocation becomes a race on funding. It is surprising that a ‘home team’ (in this case FTB) commissioned by an ICB to provide secondary mental health services is not permitted to make its own funding decisions for specialist units, as it can for acute wards and PICU’s. As can be seen from the evidence Amina was able to be transferred within 24hrs once a PICU accepted her on 01.08.23, albeit it took a wholly unsatisfactory 6 weeks to find a PICU bed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require each Integrated Care Board to develop and publish a three-year plan to localise and realign mental health inpatient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support this aim, NHS England published the Commissioning Framework for Mental Health Inpatient Services in early 2024 and introduced a requirement in its Operational Planning Guidance (2024/25) that each Integrated Care Board (ICB) develop and publish a 3 year plan to localise and realign care to the evidence-base summarised in the Framework. Local plans need to cover within them how they will cease the practice of sending people to inpatient services at a distance from their home and/or to outdated or risky models of provision – underpinned by the philosophy that ‘all means all’, and people with acute mental health needs should have access to the evidence-based therapeutic offers they need as close to home as possible and adjusted to their needs. This includes acute and rehabilitation inpatient services.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide £42 million recurrent funding to Integrated Care Boards to support delivery of localised and realigned inpatient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Final ICB plans are due for publication, and £42 million recurrent funding has been provided to ICBs to support delivery.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run the Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Inpatient Quality Transformation Programme to localise and realign inpatient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2022, NHS England launched the Mental Health, Learning Disability and Autism Inpatient Quality Transformation programme. A core aim of the programme is to localise and realign care, harnessing the potential of people and communities. The programme is built upon the cornerstones of good mental healthcare; continuity of care, therapeutic relationships and a relentless commitment to mental health care meeting the needs of all citizens.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the Commissioning Framework for Mental Health Inpatient Services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support this aim, NHS England published the Commissioning Framework for Mental Health Inpatient Services in early 2024 and introduced a requirement in its Operational Planning Guidance (2024/25) that each Integrated Care Board (ICB) develop and publish a 3 year plan to localise and realign care to the evidence-base summarised in the Framework. Local plans need to cover within them how they will cease the practice of sending people to inpatient services at a distance from their home and/or to outdated or risky models of provision – underpinned by the philosophy that ‘all means all’, and people with acute mental health needs should have access to the evidence-based therapeutic offers they need as close to home as possible and adjusted to their needs. This includes acute and rehabilitation inpatient services.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with the NHS to maximise mental health service capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage bed capacity, the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting and the availability of specialist personality disorder rehabilitation units. I understand that mental health services have been under significant strain in recent years due to the rise in demand and the Department will continue to work with the NHS to maximise capacity.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Integrated care boards are responsible for developing three-year plans to localise and realign inpatient mental health care, including independent-sector provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2022 NHS England launched the mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient quality transformation programme. A core aim of the programme is to localise and realign care, harnessing the potential of people and communities. The programme is built upon the cornerstones of good mental healthcare; continuity of care, therapeutic relationships and a commitment to mental health care meeting the needs of the population. All integrated care boards have been tasked by NHS England with developing 3-year plans to localise and realign inpatient mental health care, including NHS-funded care provided by the independent sector, as part of this programme.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual trusts and local health systems are responsible for assessing and managing bed capacity, patient flow and specialist rehabilitation-unit availability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage bed capacity, the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting and the availability of specialist personality disorder rehabilitation units. I understand that mental health services have been under significant strain in recent years due to the rise in demand and the Department will continue to work with the NHS to maximise capacity.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Operate a Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share relevant learning and insights across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  2. 2

    Run the universal Culture of Care Improvement Programme, including support for ward manager development, personalised risk and safety planning, and staff support.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  3. 3

    Deliver mental health care in the community through new models of care and support to reduce hospital admissions.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share relevant learning and insights across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Amina, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run the universal Culture of Care Improvement Programme, including support for ward manager development, personalised risk and safety planning, and staff support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This sits alongside work focused on improving the culture of inpatient services. In 2024, NHS England launched a universal Culture of Care Improvement Programme,”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mental health care in the community through new models of care and support to reduce hospital admissions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of our mission to build an NHS fit for the future, we will make sure mental health care is delivered in the community, close to people’s homes, through new models of care and support, so that fewer people need to go into hospital.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026