PFD report

Christopher William Gibbs · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Mar 2019•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of cycle lanes on both sides of the carriageway
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate cycle-lane provision for cyclist safety
  2. Lack of warning signs alerting drivers to the potential presence of cyclists
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Introduce parallel safer routes along sections of the A338.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 June 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Cycle warning signs on the A338 cannot be supported because their proposed use is not prescribed by TSRGD 2016.

    Stated by Dorset CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of cycle lanes on both sides of the carriageway

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: I. There is no cycle lane on either side of the carriage way. II. There are no warning signs to drivers making them aware of the potential presence of cyclists. Warning signs at the east bound carriageway near the Blackwater junction and westbound carriageway soon after the Ashley Heath roundabout would prompt such consideration by drivers in what would then be an unremarkable 10 mile drive. Such information would hopefully be at the fore front of drivers minds as they commenced this 10 mile section of his/her journey. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate cycle-lane provision for cyclist safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of warning signs alerting drivers to the potential presence of cyclists

Wider context from the report

“2. I have concerns with regard to the following: I. There is no cycle lane on either side of the carriage way. II. There are no warning signs to drivers making them aware of the potential presence of cyclists. Warning signs at the east bound carriageway near the Blackwater junction and westbound carriageway soon after the Ashley Heath roundabout would prompt such consideration by drivers in what would then be an unremarkable 10 mile drive. Such information would hopefully be at the fore front of drivers minds as they commenced this 10 mile section of his/her journey. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce parallel safer routes along sections of the A338.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As noted in your report cyclists are permitted to use dual carriageways. However, the speed differential between cyclists and other vehicles can be high and it may be prudent for cyclists to consider alternative routes. For this reason, the Council has taken steps to introduce parallel safer routes along some sections of the A338 and does not propose to promote or encourage cycling on the A338 itself.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cycle warning signs on the A338 cannot be supported because their proposed use is not prescribed by TSRGD 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The request to install cycling warning signing on the A338, whilst understandable is not something that we are able or willing to support as it is not the prescribed use of such signs as per the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions (TSRGD) 2016. TSRGD 2016 states that cycle warning signs ‘… may be used to warn traffic of a place where a cycle route crosses or joins a road and is not controlled by traffic signals.’ Such signs are therefore not to be used to warning of the possible presence of cyclists.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional cycle facilities, signing or lighting on the A338 are not considered necessary because the casualty record does not warrant them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have investigated the casualty accident history in the section of road over a length of 2km before BCP Council’s boundary. There have been 7 collisions here over the last 5 years that resulted in casualties. These included 3 minor injuries and 1 serious injury. These incidents do not form a cluster site and none of these incidents involved cyclists. Therefore, unfortunately, this location is not sufficiently highly ranking to justify any engineering intervention, purely on the grounds of road safety.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The fatal incident location was outside BCP Council’s jurisdiction, so BCP Council was not responsible for intervention there.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I thought it would be helpful to clarify the location of the incident in respect to the boundaries of the jurisdictions at the time of the incident and also at the present time. At the time of the incident the location was approximately 6.4km beyond the boundary of Bournemouth Borough Council’s jurisdiction. It occurred within the section of the A338 that Dorset County Council then had responsibility for.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited road-safety funding prevents BCP Council from implementing all requested modifications, requiring casualty-based prioritisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Generally speaking, in regard to modifications to the layout of roads to improve safety, such as signing and lighting or measures to reduce speed, BCP Council receive large numbers of requests and far more than we can afford to implement. In order to reduce the maximum number of casualties with the finite funding available we prioritise road safety requests on the basis of actual casualty evidence.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Install average speed cameras between Cooper Dean Roundabout and Blackwater junction.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  2. 2

    Introduce reduced speed limits along urban sections of the A338.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  3. 3

    Deliver cycling facilities through more than 100 schemes funded by over £7.5 million of investment.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  4. 4

    Undertake media campaigns advising drivers and cyclists on behaviours and equipment that improve cyclist safety.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  5. 5

    Work to secure additional Transforming Cities Fund funding for further cycle schemes on key cycling routes.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  6. 6

    Install facilities enabling cyclists to negotiate A338 slip roads safely.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 June 2019.
  7. 7

    Develop plans to install cycle facilities along well-used sections of Wallisdown Road.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 June 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install average speed cameras between Cooper Dean Roundabout and Blackwater junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of a major highway programme and the development at Wessex Fields, the Council has taken the opportunity to install average speed cameras between Cooper Dean Roundabout and Blackwater junction and it is anticipated that once active, along with existing speed camera sites, these will help moderate traffic flows and speeds and improve safety along the route. In addition, once both phases of the Wessex Fields highway development have been introduced, this will offer an improved alternative route for cyclist travelling from Bournemouth up to Holdenhurst Village and towards the Airport.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce reduced speed limits along urban sections of the A338.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although the incident occurred outside our new boundary, in terms of the rest of the A338 within BCP Council’s area, it is worth noting that significant sections have had ‘strip’ that can be used by cyclists to keep them out of the main traffic flow. In addition, the Council has previously introduced reduced speed limits of 50mph and 40mph along the more urban sections of the A338 and it has installed facilities to allow cyclists to safely negotiate slip roads. We do not currently have plans to introduce additional cycle facilities, signing or additional lighting on this route as the casualty record does not warrant such action and the route is not one we plan to actively promote for cyclists.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver cycling facilities through more than 100 schemes funded by over £7.5 million of investment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In regard to wider transport policy, BCP Council is promoting the use of cycling and other sustainable travel modes in general, as these help alleviate congestion and bring wider health and environmental benefits. To support and encourage this growth, the Council has introduced a significant number of facilities designed to make cycling easier, safer and more direct. For example, in Bournemouth, these include investment of more than £7.5m over the last 10 yrs to fund the delivery of over 100 schemes. It also regularly undertakes media campaigns advising drivers to look out for cyclists and give them space, and for cyclists to use helmets, lights, bright or hi viz clothing to make themselves as conspicuous and safe as possible.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake media campaigns advising drivers and cyclists on behaviours and equipment that improve cyclist safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In regard to wider transport policy, BCP Council is promoting the use of cycling and other sustainable travel modes in general, as these help alleviate congestion and bring wider health and environmental benefits. To support and encourage this growth, the Council has introduced a significant number of facilities designed to make cycling easier, safer and more direct. For example, in Bournemouth, these include investment of more than £7.5m over the last 10 yrs to fund the delivery of over 100 schemes. It also regularly undertakes media campaigns advising drivers to look out for cyclists and give them space, and for cyclists to use helmets, lights, bright or hi viz clothing to make themselves as conspicuous and safe as possible.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work to secure additional Transforming Cities Fund funding for further cycle schemes on key cycling routes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BCP Council is currently working on plans to install cycle facilities along sections of Wallisdown Rd that are well used by cyclists and it is also working to secure substantial additional funding through the Transforming Cities Fund to allow more cycle schemes to be brought forward along key cycling routes. These will hopefully link the outer areas of the conurbation, such as Ferndown and Ringwood, providing an alternative safe route for cyclist to commute into Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install facilities enabling cyclists to negotiate A338 slip roads safely.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although the incident occurred outside our new boundary, in terms of the rest of the A338 within BCP Council’s area, it is worth noting that significant sections have had ‘strip’ that can be used by cyclists to keep them out of the main traffic flow. In addition, the Council has previously introduced reduced speed limits of 50mph and 40mph along the more urban sections of the A338 and it has installed facilities to allow cyclists to safely negotiate slip roads. We do not currently have plans to introduce additional cycle facilities, signing or additional lighting on this route as the casualty record does not warrant such action and the route is not one we plan to actively promote for cyclists.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop plans to install cycle facilities along well-used sections of Wallisdown Road.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BCP Council is currently working on plans to install cycle facilities along sections of Wallisdown Rd that are well used by cyclists and it is also working to secure substantial additional funding through the Transforming Cities Fund to allow more cycle schemes to be brought forward along key cycling routes. These will hopefully link the outer areas of the conurbation, such as Ferndown and Ringwood, providing an alternative safe route for cyclist to commute into Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole.”

Source location

2019-0100-Response-by-Dorset-County-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 11 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026