Daniel PINKNEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Nov 2024•East Riding and Hull

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of Highway Code guidance on aquaplaning

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. The Royal Society For The Prevention Of Accidents

    Engage with the Department for Transport and DVSA regarding the coroner’s findings on aquaplaning and surface-water risks.

  2. The Royal Society For The Prevention Of Accidents

    Create and share digital education materials on aquaplaning awareness through social media and the RoSPA website.

  3. Department for Transport

    Develop a road safety strategy to reduce deaths and injuries on roads.

  4. Department for Transport

    Work with stakeholders to amplify road safety messages, including aquaplaning where appropriate.

  5. Department for Transport

    Consult on Highway Code changes and consider adding aquaplaning advice during the next major revision.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department for Transport

    Existing Highway Code rules and DVSA advice provide appropriate guidance on aquaplaning, so no immediate Code update is planned.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. Department for Transport

    Local highway authorities are responsible for assessing drainage maintenance needs and deciding how to fulfil their statutory maintenance duty.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Highway Code guidance on aquaplaning

Wider context from the report

“I believe that greater awareness of the phenomenon of aquaplaning is important, together with the need to reduce speed when surface water is present, coupled with basic knowledge about braking and steering, should a vehicle experience this phenomenon. I was informed by a forensic collision expert that the Highway Code is at present silent on this matter but road user should be familiar with it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with the Department for Transport and DVSA regarding the coroner’s findings on aquaplaning and surface-water risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions to be taken by RoSPA Your report highlights the issue of aquaplaning, and the risks associated with driving through surface water. In response to your concerns, we outline below the actions RoSPA intends to advocate for to enhance road safety and reduce the risk of similar incidents in the future:”

Source location

Response from ROSPA
Page 1 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and share digital education materials on aquaplaning awareness through social media and the RoSPA website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions to be taken by RoSPA Your report highlights the issue of aquaplaning, and the risks associated with driving through surface water. In response to your concerns, we outline below the actions RoSPA intends to advocate for to enhance road safety and reduce the risk of similar incidents in the future:”

Source location

Response from ROSPA
Page 1 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a road safety strategy to reduce deaths and injuries on roads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This Government takes road safety very seriously, and we are committed to reducing the numbers of those killed and injured on our roads. My Department is developing our road safety strategy and will set out more details in due course.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with stakeholders to amplify road safety messages, including aquaplaning where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to work with stakeholders to amplify road safety messages and will encourage them to do this with aquaplaning where appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on Highway Code changes and consider adding aquaplaning advice during the next major revision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Highway Code has historically undergone a major revision approximately every ten years and we currently have no plans to carry out a major revision. When we carry out the next revision to the Code, we will as usual undertake a consultation on proposed changes and this would offer the appropriate opportunity to consider including advice on aquaplaning.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Highway Code rules and DVSA advice provide appropriate guidance on aquaplaning, so no immediate Code update is planned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You recommended updating the Highway Code to raise awareness about aquaplaning. You also mentioned the importance of reducing speed when surface water is present, and basic knowledge about braking and steering.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local highway authorities are responsible for assessing drainage maintenance needs and deciding how to fulfil their statutory maintenance duty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You also mentioned blockage of drainage gulley’s as a factor in the collision. Local highway authorities have a duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 7 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026