Lee James Nauman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 May 2016•West Yorkshire (Western)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to keep the road surface clear of leaf and soil debris
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair
  2. Failure to maintain the road surface free from potholes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Bradford City Council

    Order pothole filling and edge-of-carriageway patching at locations between Cottingley Moor Road and Bank Top.

  2. Bradford City Council

    Inspect Lee Lane and identify carriageway defects requiring remedial work.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Bradford City Council

    The collision appears to have resulted from loose gravel rather than potholes at or beyond the carriageway edge.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep the road surface clear of leaf and soil debris

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from ████████ (Collision Investigator), who conducted an examination of the road surface approximately 32.4 metres to the Cottingley side of the collision scene and found that the extreme nearside edge of the road surface was broken and crumbling away, leaving a pothole approximately 4 metres long and 5cm deep encroaching onto the road surface approximately 0.6 metres from the extreme nearside edge. He also found an area of leaf and soil debris upon the road surface 14 metres in length across the whole width of the road encompassing the pothole. Although there was no evidence to suggest that this caused or contributed to the loss of control of the motorcycle, ████████ was unable to discount the possibility that it may have had a contributory effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain the road surface free from potholes

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from ████████ (Collision Investigator), who conducted an examination of the road surface approximately 32.4 metres to the Cottingley side of the collision scene and found that the extreme nearside edge of the road surface was broken and crumbling away, leaving a pothole approximately 4 metres long and 5cm deep encroaching onto the road surface approximately 0.6 metres from the extreme nearside edge. He also found an area of leaf and soil debris upon the road surface 14 metres in length across the whole width of the road encompassing the pothole. Although there was no evidence to suggest that this caused or contributed to the loss of control of the motorcycle, ████████ was unable to discount the possibility that it may have had a contributory effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Order pothole filling and edge-of-carriageway patching at locations between Cottingley Moor Road and Bank Top.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following an inspection of Lee Lane, some work was ordered on w/c 16 May to address issued identified during a site inspection of the issues highlighted in the Regulation 28 notification. These works consist of pothole filling and patching, primarily along the edge of carriageway at various locations between Cottingley Moor Road and Bank Top.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect Lee Lane and identify carriageway defects requiring remedial work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following an inspection of Lee Lane, some work was ordered on w/c 16 May to address issued identified during a site inspection of the issues highlighted in the Regulation 28 notification. These works consist of pothole filling and patching, primarily along the edge of carriageway at various locations between Cottingley Moor Road and Bank Top.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The collision appears to have resulted from loose gravel rather than potholes at or beyond the carriageway edge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I realise that the inquest has now concluded, but it would appear that the motorcyclist, on approaching the slight left hand bend towards the brow of the hill at Moor View Crescent, slid on loose gravel, rather than hitting the potholes at/beyond the edge of the carriageway.”

Source location

Response from Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026