PFD report

William Edward TURNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Oct 2020•County Durham and Darlington

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Potential inadequacy of driving-licence surrender time frames for seizure risk
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Ask the medical advisory panel to review the required seizure-free period before driving licence reinstatement.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Licensing AgencyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 December 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The 12-month seizure-free standard and treatment, appointment and reporting declarations are considered sufficient to ensure only low-risk drivers receive licences.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Licensing AgencyExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential inadequacy of driving-licence surrender time frames for seizure risk

Wider context from the report

“(3) The time frames of 6 months and 12 months for surrender of the drivers licence were provided in the Regulations, which are framed and from time to time amended pursuant to recommendations of the Secretary of State for Transport’s Honorary Medical Advisory Panel on Driving and Disorders of the Nervous System, which you chair. (4) Is there scope for re-visiting these time frames in the light of the facts of this case, or at least reviewing them in the light of this case? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask the medical advisory panel to review the required seizure-free period before driving licence reinstatement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The rules governing epilepsy and seizures are regularly reviewed by the medical experts on Secretary of State for Transport’s Honorary Medical Advisory Panel on Disorders of the Nervous System. As road safety is our priority, I will ask the panel to review the period of time required off driving before someone who has suffered a seizure can regain their driving licence.”

Source location

2020-0209-Response-from-the-DVLA_Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 3 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The 12-month seizure-free standard and treatment, appointment and reporting declarations are considered sufficient to ensure only low-risk drivers receive licences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It may help if I explain that for epilepsy, the fitness to drive standards are based on the risk of seizure recurrence while driving. When considering the appropriate health standards for driving, a balance needs to be made between road safety and the needs of drivers who experience seizures.”

Source location

2020-0209-Response-from-the-DVLA_Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 3 December 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026