PFD report

Michael BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 May 2018•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of Healthcare Cell number 1 to meet reduced-risk cell design expectations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments
  2. Inward-opening window providing an obvious ligature point in a cell
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of Healthcare Cell number 1 to meet reduced-risk cell design expectations

Wider context from the report

“(1) Michael was in Healthcare Cell number 1 which throughout the Inquest was described variously as a “Reduced Risk Cell” or “Safer Cell”. It appears that in fact it is not a reduced risk cell but more a “Half Way House” in that the furniture is fixed to the floor. In the cell, however there was a very obvious ligature point that could be avoided, namely the window, which opens inwardly. On the face of it there would appear to be many design solutions that would overcome the need for an opening window that provides such an obvious ligature point. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inward-opening window providing an obvious ligature point in a cell

Wider context from the report

“(1) Michael was in Healthcare Cell number 1 which throughout the Inquest was described variously as a “Reduced Risk Cell” or “Safer Cell”. It appears that in fact it is not a reduced risk cell but more a “Half Way House” in that the furniture is fixed to the floor. In the cell, however there was a very obvious ligature point that could be avoided, namely the window, which opens inwardly. On the face of it there would appear to be many design solutions that would overcome the need for an opening window that provides such an obvious ligature point. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.