PFD report

Dennis Thomas Lavington · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Dec 2016•Southampton and New Forest

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide a safe, clearly signposted pedestrian route through the health centre car park
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Complete an independent health and safety review of the proposed car-parking improvements.

    Stated by South West Hampshire LIFT CompanyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2017.
  2. Action

    Progress implementation of the proposed car-parking improvements, obtaining planning consent where required.

    Stated by South West Hampshire LIFT CompanyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a safe, clearly signposted pedestrian route through the health centre car park

Wider context from the report

“The layout of the health centre car park leads to a potential conflict between pedestrians and car drivers. Whilst there is a drop off point outside the entrance, many of the patients are likely to be parking in the disabled parking spaces and they then have to cross the car park to reach the entrance. If there was a dedicated crossing or a marked path around the edge of the car park with improved signage, this would minimise the risk of a similar incident. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an independent health and safety review of the proposed car-parking improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further to my letter dated 8th February 2017, please be advised that I am writing to inform you that the Transport Planning Consultancy report regarding the proposed car parking improvement measures at Adelaide Health Centre, Millbrook, Southampton, SO16 4XE has now been reviewed by an independent Health and Safety Adviser appointed by the South West Hampshire LIFT Company Board.”

Source location

2016-0443-Response-by-South-West-Hampshire-Lift
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress implementation of the proposed car-parking improvements, obtaining planning consent where required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The outcome of this review endorses the proposed improvements measures identified in the TPC report, therefore, the Board has instructed such measures to be implemented. Please also note, that it is anticipated planning consent will be required from the local planning authority to implement some of the measures identified and therefore we will seek to progress the improvements at the earliest opportunity.”

Source location

2016-0443-Response-by-South-West-Hampshire-Lift
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026