PFD report

Neil Antony Black · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2019•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to examine injection sites and DVT sites
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable DVT diagnosis and management
  2. Lack of joint handovers between drug detoxification and primary care nurses
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of patients undergoing drug detoxification
  3. Failure to maintain an effective working relationship between IDTS and primary care nurses
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Deliver planned informal inter-team events, including case-busting sessions and team briefings.

    Stated by Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 May 2019.
  2. Action

    Implement the physical-observation protocol defining IDTS and B3 responsibilities, NEWS scoring, referral, escalation, and required full observations.

    Stated by Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 May 2019.
  3. Action

    Implement joint midday handovers for patients requiring physical healthcare and substance misuse treatment, amend handover records, and audit the process.

    Stated by Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 May 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing local protocols for examining injection and DVT sites reflect national guidelines, so no new examination protocol is required.

    Stated by Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to examine injection sites and DVT sites

Wider context from the report

“3. Neil Black came into prison with a DVT in his right leg which was caused by IV drug use injecting into his groins. His groins sites and leg were not examined during his time at the prison. Consideration needs to be given to ensure there is a clear protocol for the examination of injection sites and DVT sites. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinations; Unreliable DVT diagnosis and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of joint handovers between drug detoxification and primary care nurses

Wider context from the report

“1. BWing is the drug detoxification wing at Birmingham prison. Prisoners undergoing drug detoxification see IDTS nurses for drug needs and primary care nurses for health care needs. Prisoners on B wing often have complex mixed needs. The evidence at the inquest confirmed there were no joint handovers despite the nurses being located very close to each other. Consideration needs to be given to joint handovers to ensure those prisoners with joint needs have a coordinated approach. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handover of patients undergoing drug detoxification.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain an effective working relationship between IDTS and primary care nurses

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence at the inquest confirmed that there was some animosity between IDTS and primary care nurses. In addition witnesses were unclear who should undertake what observations on prisoners and for what reason. Consideration needs to be given to improving the relationship and making it clearer who is responsible for what observations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear allocation of responsibility for prisoner observations

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence at the inquest confirmed that there was some animosity between IDTS and primary care nurses. In addition witnesses were unclear who should undertake what observations on prisoners and for what reason. Consideration needs to be given to improving the relationship and making it clearer who is responsible for what observations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver planned informal inter-team events, including case-busting sessions and team briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we acknowledge there are challenges in the teams working relationships we can also cite a number of good practices and interim team working that we have initiated over the last year. We hold a Management/Leaders meeting every Monday morning where any issues are aired and can be immediately resolved to ensure problems are rapidly discussed and solutions implemented. To further improve the teams working together we have established a Band 7 (Team Manager) meeting for all healthcare teams on a monthly basis. This meeting will provide an opportunity where any issues between the healthcare teams can be openly discussed and resolutions agreed at an appropriately senior level. We have also planned a series of more informal events to support inter team working – these include “case busting” and team briefings.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the physical-observation protocol defining IDTS and B3 responsibilities, NEWS scoring, referral, escalation, and required full observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to the physical observations there is a new protocol which clarifies the process for physical observations on prisoners. IDTS nurses complete observations for people at risk of withdrawal which ensures people are experiencing a safe detoxification.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement joint midday handovers for patients requiring physical healthcare and substance misuse treatment, amend handover records, and audit the process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We commenced a process on 11 February 2019 whereby the Nurse in Charge for both the “B3” team (the primary, or physical, healthcare team employed by BCHC) and the “IDTS” team (the Integrated Drug Treatment Service team employed by BSMH) have a verbal handover at the midday handover for any patients who are presenting as requiring joint care for both physical care and substance misuse treatment. The handover documents for both IDTS and B3 will be amended to ensure these patients discussed are recorded. This will be audited after one month to ensure the process is effective and any amendments to this process will be made.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review national guidance and local protocols for DVT management and examination of intravenous injection sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have carefully reviewed the national guidelines and our current protocols in relation to both the management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the physical examination of intravenous (IV) injection sites. We are content that our local protocols reflect national guidelines. Unfortunately in this particular case our local protocols were not followed and a reminder went out to all healthcare staff on 13 February 2019 to ensure that all appropriate observations at any physical examination are carried out.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish monthly Band 7 meetings for healthcare teams to discuss inter-team issues and agree resolutions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we acknowledge there are challenges in the teams working relationships we can also cite a number of good practices and interim team working that we have initiated over the last year. We hold a Management/Leaders meeting every Monday morning where any issues are aired and can be immediately resolved to ensure problems are rapidly discussed and solutions implemented. To further improve the teams working together we have established a Band 7 (Team Manager) meeting for all healthcare teams on a monthly basis. This meeting will provide an opportunity where any issues between the healthcare teams can be openly discussed and resolutions agreed at an appropriately senior level. We have also planned a series of more informal events to support inter team working – these include “case busting” and team briefings.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind all healthcare staff to complete appropriate observations during physical examinations of injection and DVT sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have carefully reviewed the national guidelines and our current protocols in relation to both the management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the physical examination of intravenous (IV) injection sites. We are content that our local protocols reflect national guidelines. Unfortunately in this particular case our local protocols were not followed and a reminder went out to all healthcare staff on 13 February 2019 to ensure that all appropriate observations at any physical examination are carried out.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing local protocols for examining injection and DVT sites reflect national guidelines, so no new examination protocol is required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have carefully reviewed the national guidelines and our current protocols in relation to both the management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the physical examination of intravenous (IV) injection sites. We are content that our local protocols reflect national guidelines. Unfortunately in this particular case our local protocols were not followed and a reminder went out to all healthcare staff on 13 February 2019 to ensure that all appropriate observations at any physical examination are carried out.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Liaise with both Trusts’ Organisational Development teams to review whether additional organisational development work would be beneficial.

    Stated by Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 May 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with both Trusts’ Organisational Development teams to review whether additional organisational development work would be beneficial.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will liaise with each Trust’s Organisational Development Team to review if additional Organisation Development work would be beneficial.”

Source location

2019-0024-Response-by-Birmingham-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 23 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026