PFD report

Mark Andrew Burgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Feb 2014•Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the road lighting system to operate during hours of darkness
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting
  2. Insufficient visibility for drivers to detect carriageway debris and avoid collisions
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the road lighting system to operate during hours of darkness

Wider context from the report

“I received a report from ████████ a Road Safety Engineer employed by Balfour Beatty Mott MacDonald, on behalf of the Highways Agency. That report confirmed that the current road lighting system for that section of the M65 Motorway was not operating during the hours of darkness, having been decommissioned in March 2011, as part of a “full lighting switch-off” process. The collision involving Mr Burgess left debris in the carriageway, including an engine block which had become detached from his vehicle. I heard evidence from four witnesses, each of whom were unable to see the debris in the unlit carriageway, such that over a period of several minutes four other vehicles then collided with debris and/or accident damaged vehicles. In addition to Mr Burgess who was killed there were up to eleven other people who received varying degrees of injuries. The evidence I received was that in the absence of any street lighting and in the absence of any ambient light, including moonlight, and once vehicles had sustained sufficient damage such that no lights were operating, drivers were unable to avoid further collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient visibility for drivers to detect carriageway debris and avoid collisions

Wider context from the report

“I received a report from ████████ a Road Safety Engineer employed by Balfour Beatty Mott MacDonald, on behalf of the Highways Agency. That report confirmed that the current road lighting system for that section of the M65 Motorway was not operating during the hours of darkness, having been decommissioned in March 2011, as part of a “full lighting switch-off” process. The collision involving Mr Burgess left debris in the carriageway, including an engine block which had become detached from his vehicle. I heard evidence from four witnesses, each of whom were unable to see the debris in the unlit carriageway, such that over a period of several minutes four other vehicles then collided with debris and/or accident damaged vehicles. In addition to Mr Burgess who was killed there were up to eleven other people who received varying degrees of injuries. The evidence I received was that in the absence of any street lighting and in the absence of any ambient light, including moonlight, and once vehicles had sustained sufficient damage such that no lights were operating, drivers were unable to avoid further collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locations.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.