PFD report

Isla Peyton LORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Feb 2016•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to coordinate an agreed delivery plan between tertiary and local hospitals
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide individualised pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planningPart of recurring concern: Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable care-planning processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Amend the obstetric ultrasound policy to require consultants to obtain and clearly document agreed delivery and neonatal care plans.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 February 2016.
  2. Action

    Disseminate the amended policy by adding it to the Trust guidelines folder and notifying obstetric doctors.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 February 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to coordinate an agreed delivery plan between tertiary and local hospitals

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence it became apparent that once the possibility of heart anomalies was identified at University College Hospital in London (UCLH), there was no liaison between Princess Alexandra Hospital in Harlow and UCLH as to the plan for the delivery of the baby. It was simply agreed that UCLH were content for her to be delivered at the local hospital with a referral being made to Great Ormond Street Hospital after delivery. In order to prevent deaths in the future there needs to be a review of the system that exists between the tertiary hospitals and Princess Alexandra Hospital as to how to formulate an Agreed Delivery Plan for both mother and baby. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide individualised pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning; Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient care; Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the obstetric ultrasound policy to require consultants to obtain and clearly document agreed delivery and neonatal care plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Standard Operating Policy for obstetric ultrasound scanning has been amended to include that consultants in charge of patients referred for second opinion in tertiary centres should request a detailed plan for delivery of the mother and care of the baby. The policy also requests the consultants to document the plan clearly in the patient’s hand held notes and hospital notes.”

Source location

I-lord-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 5 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the amended policy by adding it to the Trust guidelines folder and notifying obstetric doctors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The new policy has been added to the Trust guidelines folder accessible by all clinicians.”

Source location

I-lord-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 5 February 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Notify and monitor tertiary-centre referrals through the weekly Multidisciplinary Paediatric Plans of Care Meeting.

    Stated by the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 February 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify and monitor tertiary-centre referrals through the weekly Multidisciplinary Paediatric Plans of Care Meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Referrals to tertiary centres will be notified to and monitored by the weekly Multidisciplinary Paediatric Plans of Care Meeting.”

Source location

I-lord-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 5 February 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026