PFD report

Mrs Pamela Craigie · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Sep 2017•West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to make urgent 1:1 care funding referrals when criteria are met
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable funding responsibility and referral arrangements for required care
  2. Lack of clear criteria and timing for referrals for 1:1 care funding
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable funding responsibility and referral arrangements for required care
  3. Delays in urgent multi-disciplinary team assessments for 1:1 care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Ensure staff refer residents for 1:1 care when the policy criteria are met.

    Stated by St Medana Holdings LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 November 2017.
  2. Action

    Outline interim steps in the Falls Prevention Policy to manage resident falls risk while funding decisions are pending.

    Stated by St Medana Holdings LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 November 2017.
  3. Action

    Issue the revised Falls Prevention Policy to all company homes, including Cloisters.

    Stated by St Medana Holdings LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 November 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Falls may still occur despite 1:1 supervision or supervision in communal areas, so increased supervision does not eliminate the risk.

    Stated by St Medana Holdings LimitedDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make urgent 1:1 care funding referrals when criteria are met

Wider context from the report

“2. That it is 'very difficult' to get funding from the local authority for 1:1 care. I am concerned that applications to the local authority for urgent 1:1 care are not being made, because the Home feel that they have been refused before and that a future application will not be successful. The Home should ensure that where the criteria for 1:1 care is met, that a referral for funding is always made. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable funding responsibility and referral arrangements for required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear criteria and timing for referrals for 1:1 care funding

Wider context from the report

“1. A resident would only be likely to warrant funding for 1:1 care if they were falling "almost every day, or every week". There is no set number of times they would be required to fall. However, it is not clear from the staff who gave evidence, when a referral for funding for 1:1 care should be made to the local authority, and based on what criteria. The Home should ensure that the criteria for 1:1 care is clear to staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable funding responsibility and referral arrangements for required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in urgent multi-disciplinary team assessments for 1:1 care

Wider context from the report

“3. If the Home does consider that a resident needs urgent 1:1 care e.g. because of a very high risk of falls, the Home sends a referral form to the London Borough of Hounslow. In their experience it takes two, or two-and-a-half weeks, for the urgent multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting to occur. This seems to be a very long time for an urgent assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of effective interim management of residents at high risk of falls pending 1:1 care

Wider context from the report

“4. Following the above, in the interim, the Home informs the family that the resident is a high risk of falls, but it is not clear how the high risk is managed effectively until 1:1 care is put in place (or until the MDT meeting). The Home should ensure that steps are taken to ensure the safety of the resident in the interim. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure staff refer residents for 1:1 care when the policy criteria are met.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The revised Falls Prevention Policy was issued to all homes within the Company, including Cloisters, in October 2017 and all Registered Managers will ensure that the policy is followed and will refer residents for 1:1 care when the criteria is met.”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Outline interim steps in the Falls Prevention Policy to manage resident falls risk while funding decisions are pending.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has outlined, so far as is reasonably practicable steps, to manage the risk whilst waiting for funding in the interim. This is outlined in the Falls Prevention Policy, page 11, section 14”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue the revised Falls Prevention Policy to all company homes, including Cloisters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The revised Falls Prevention Policy was issued to all homes within the Company, including Cloisters, in October 2017 and all Registered Managers will ensure that the policy is followed and will refer residents for 1:1 care when the criteria is met.”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Falls Prevention Policy and resident risk assessments to define the protocol for providing 1:1 care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has reviewed its Falls Prevention Policy and has updated its risk assessments in line with that amended Policy. The Policy now clearly states the protocol that staff are to follow should a resident require 1:1 care: Falls Prevention Policy, page 11, section 14”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Falls may still occur despite 1:1 supervision or supervision in communal areas, so increased supervision does not eliminate the risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To conclude, the Company has discussed this case in full in order to attempt to minimise the risk of falls. Learning has taken place within the Company. However, it is important to note that although a resident may have 1:1 supervision and or be supervised in a communal setting, the risk of fall occurring may still be high despite those increased supervision levels.”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commissioners decide whether funding for additional 1:1 support is provided following reassessment of the resident’s needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, if a Resident continues to have frequent falls, defined as 2 or more per month, and all equipment is in place to manage this risk and there has been input from the local falls team and/or G.P, and the Resident still continues to experience a high number of falls, then the Home Manager will liaise with the Commissioners to request a re-assessment of needs. This may result in 1:1 support for that person to manage the risk. In these cases, the Home Manager will liaise with the Operations Manager to request a re-assessment or specific funding.”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Undertake company learning from the circumstances addressed in the response to minimise falls risk.

    Stated by St Medana Holdings LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 November 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake company learning from the circumstances addressed in the response to minimise falls risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To conclude, the Company has discussed this case in full in order to attempt to minimise the risk of falls. Learning has taken place within the Company. However, it is important to note that although a resident may have 1:1 supervision and or be supervised in a communal setting, the risk of fall occurring may still be high despite those increased supervision levels.”

Source location

2017-0279-Response-by-Advinia-Health-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 27 November 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026