PFD report

Tanya Christine PAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Feb 2015•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to promptly communicate critical self-harm risk information between wards
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to promptly communicate critical self-harm risk information between wards

Wider context from the report

“1. When Ms Page was transferred from Sapphire to Opal Ward, she disclosed that she had tried to hang herself whilst on Sapphire a few days before. Opal Ward staff members were shocked at this but, though they recorded the disclosure in the medical notes, they did not alert any staff member from Sapphire until after Ms Page’s death. From the evidence given by the consultant psychiatrist on Opal Ward, there appeared to be a reluctance to draw attention to this information, because of the perception that it carried with it a criticism of the staff on Sapphire. However, it was important that staff on Sapphire were told, both from the point of view of Ms Page herself, and because this was a valuable piece of learning for them that could affect how they cared for other patients. The worry about perceived blame should not have prevented prompt discussion. There were other learning points discussed during the inquest, such as the necessity to search the laundry room as well as bedroom of a patient feared to be at risk of self harm; the potential for wardrobe doors to act as a ligature point and the desirability of sharing that learning nationally; and the training issues around use of alarms, ligatures, general patient safety and resuscitation techniques. However, evidence was given that steps have already been taken by the trust to act upon these and so I do not need to comment on them further. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.