PFD report

David Anthony Ince · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Nov 2014•Preston and West Lancashire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to routinely hand over ambulance-obtained ECG traces to A&E staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility
  2. Failure to record ECG findings and relevant features in A&E handover notes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely hand over ambulance-obtained ECG traces to A&E staff

Wider context from the report

“(1) In the course of the Inquest hearing, it became apparent that the NWAS electronic record referred to an ECG having been carried out on Mr Ince by the ambulance staff at 11.35pm, prior to his first admission to A&E. However the fact of an ECG and its relevant features was not recorded in the notes of the A&E nurse who received the verbal handover from NWAS personnel on arrival at RPH, and no ECG trace was handed over or seen by A&E staff. (2) It was the evidence of the Middle Grade doctor in Emergency Medicine, who had subsequently assessed and treated Mr Ince in the A&E department, that NWAS staff often have to be asked for ECG traces which they have obtained on patients, and will often have to return to their vehicles to get them, rather than handing them over to A&E staff as a matter of course when delivering patients to the department. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record ECG findings and relevant features in A&E handover notes

Wider context from the report

“(1) In the course of the Inquest hearing, it became apparent that the NWAS electronic record referred to an ECG having been carried out on Mr Ince by the ambulance staff at 11.35pm, prior to his first admission to A&E. However the fact of an ECG and its relevant features was not recorded in the notes of the A&E nurse who received the verbal handover from NWAS personnel on arrival at RPH, and no ECG trace was handed over or seen by A&E staff. (2) It was the evidence of the Middle Grade doctor in Emergency Medicine, who had subsequently assessed and treated Mr Ince in the A&E department, that NWAS staff often have to be asked for ECG traces which they have obtained on patients, and will often have to return to their vehicles to get them, rather than handing them over to A&E staff as a matter of course when delivering patients to the department. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.