PFD report

Lorraine Anne Molyneaux and James Anthony Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Feb 2020•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a suitable pedestrian crossing near the bus stops and entrance to Turbary Retail Park
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks
  2. Insufficient street lighting between Mountbatten Roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
  3. Failure to ensure street lighting is working between Mountbatten Roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lightingPart of recurring concern: Inadequate outdoor safety lighting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Complete a joint fatal-collision investigation and site visit with the Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 February 2020.
  2. Action

    Prioritise crossing design work within the Transforming Cities Fund requirements to support the anticipated road-layout adjustment.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 February 2020.
  3. Action

    Review the lighting design and establish whether illumination levels meet requirements for the road layout.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 February 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing lighting levels and sensor operation are considered adequate; illumination will not normally be improved unless specifically recommended by a safety report.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a suitable pedestrian crossing near the bus stops and entrance to Turbary Retail Park

Wider context from the report

“i. The deaths of Lorraine and James now bring the total fatalities to 3 in the same location and in similar circumstances since September 2018. I have concerns that there could be future deaths at this location if action is not taken. ii. I therefore request that a review is undertaken of the pedestrian crossings and the layout of Ringwood Road outside of Turbary Retail Park. I request that consideration is given to the placing of a pedestrian crossing closer to the bus stops and the entrance to Turbary Retail Park as soon as possible to avoid future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient street lighting between Mountbatten Roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout

Wider context from the report

“iii. I further request that the street lighting between Mountbatten roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout is reviewed in relation to the amount of lighting and to ensure that the current lighting is working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure street lighting is working between Mountbatten Roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout

Wider context from the report

“iii. I further request that the street lighting between Mountbatten roundabout and Clock Garage Roundabout is reviewed in relation to the amount of lighting and to ensure that the current lighting is working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate and unreliable public-road street lighting; Inadequate outdoor safety lighting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a joint fatal-collision investigation and site visit with the Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BCP Council carries out joint investigations into fatal road traffic collisions in conjunction with the Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer. With regards to the incident on Ringwood Rd, the site was visited by three officers at 10.00hrs on Tuesday 26th Nov 2019 (see Appendix A).”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prioritise crossing design work within the Transforming Cities Fund requirements to support the anticipated road-layout adjustment.

Verbatim wording from the response

““To consider the installation of a controlled crossing at this location. Transforming Cities Fund (TCF) bid submitted to DfT on 28 November (2019). Ringwood Road is on a TCF route where treatment may be considered. This may be in the form of a controlled crossing or the installation of a new signalised junction with pedestrian facilities. Any works at this location to be discussed with TCF programme manager”.”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the lighting design and establish whether illumination levels meet requirements for the road layout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report also raised that there were concerns raised by one witness about the perceived level of street lighting and the fact that some of the lanterns were not working.”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identify the crossing location as a funding priority and submit a Transforming Cities Fund bid for treatment there.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have clearly indicated in your report, BCP Council has identified this location as a priority for the funding of a crossing facility following a previous incident in September 2018 which involved the death of a pedestrian crossing the road at this location. The Fatal Accident report that followed the site visit recommended the following remedial action:”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out a prioritised additional day-and-night survey to measure actual illumination levels at the location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a part of our normal working practice and in order to carry out a full and detailed check of the actual illumination levels on site we are required to visit the location during the day to measure and mark out several light calculation points on the road and footway then followed up with a visit during the hours of darkness for measurement to be made by use of a light meter.”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing lighting levels and sensor operation are considered adequate; illumination will not normally be improved unless specifically recommended by a safety report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council has carried out a careful review of the lighting design at this location and this has determined that the lighting levels meet or exceed those required for this type of road layout. The lighting at this location is triggered by light sensor and these sensors appear to have been working satisfactorily at the time of the incident and indeed since that time. We are aware of some lighting defects on Ringwood Road but some distance from the incident. Although not material to this incident this may possibly account for the suggestion that some lighting was not operational.”

Source location

2020-0033-Response-from-BCP-Council-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 28 February 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026