Mr. Joseph John MOCHAN (otherwise Joseph John LOPEZ) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Mar 2020•Brighton and Hove

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Fragmented provision of homeless care and support services requiring extensive travel between locations
  2. Lack of safe accommodation and associated basic hygiene, bedding, food and drink for people sleeping rough

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Explore shelter models and evidence-based practice, including expansion of Housing First, to improve outcomes for rough sleepers.

  2. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Commission and complete a feasibility report defining a new integrated healthcare facility for homeless and disadvantaged people.

  3. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Commission an integrated homeless healthcare service providing primary care, hospital outreach, community engagement, day-centre outreach and citywide leadership.

  4. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Review the healthcare feasibility report to incorporate learning from the Covid-19 response and homeless population needs.

  5. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Expand winter night shelter provision through an open-access weekend shelter service.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    The local authority is responsible for delivering the response and actions concerning the safe night shelter direction.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    A year-round night shelter cannot currently be provided because there is no identified budget or suitable building.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  3. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    The clinical commissioning group is responsible for delivering the response and actions concerning the homeless healthcare hub direction.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  4. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Existing accommodation provision is considered sufficient to prevent rough sleeping during the poorest weather.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  5. Brighton & Hove CCG and Brighton and Hove City Council

    Available evidence does not show that night shelters improve rough sleepers’ health or substance-misuse outcomes, and vulnerable people may not access them.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fragmented provision of homeless care and support services requiring extensive travel between locations

Wider context from the report

“There is it seems a political will to help homeless people in Brighton. On any given night there may be 50 to 200 people sleeping rough on the streets of the city. Many of them will be using drugs with the violence and criminality associated with this world. Many will have (associated) mental health problems and likely physical ailments as well. They have no toilet or washing facilities, no basic hygiene equipment; no change of clothing; no proper bedding; no access to healthy food and drink. The City has a large number of organisations some charitable, who are dedicated to trying to help and to give the care and support which is needed. ████████ explained to me that there are things which could help. Such helps centres around a safe place to be and availability of the services which are needed, provided at or adjacent to the safe place. He told me that it is quite possible for a homeless person to walk 5 to 10 miles a day around the city trying to access the different places where help might be available. By the time they have arrived at one place they have probably missed another appointment on the other side of the City. ████████ said that he felt there were two main things which if they could be put in place would dramatically improve the plight of the people who are the subject of this report. Additionally, and in many ways as importantly for all those involved, the services would reduce the amount of spending. Such services, if they existed would provide joined up care, accommodation and support. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of safe accommodation and associated basic hygiene, bedding, food and drink for people sleeping rough

Wider context from the report

“There is it seems a political will to help homeless people in Brighton. On any given night there may be 50 to 200 people sleeping rough on the streets of the city. Many of them will be using drugs with the violence and criminality associated with this world. Many will have (associated) mental health problems and likely physical ailments as well. They have no toilet or washing facilities, no basic hygiene equipment; no change of clothing; no proper bedding; no access to healthy food and drink. The City has a large number of organisations some charitable, who are dedicated to trying to help and to give the care and support which is needed. ████████ explained to me that there are things which could help. Such helps centres around a safe place to be and availability of the services which are needed, provided at or adjacent to the safe place. He told me that it is quite possible for a homeless person to walk 5 to 10 miles a day around the city trying to access the different places where help might be available. By the time they have arrived at one place they have probably missed another appointment on the other side of the City. ████████ said that he felt there were two main things which if they could be put in place would dramatically improve the plight of the people who are the subject of this report. Additionally, and in many ways as importantly for all those involved, the services would reduce the amount of spending. Such services, if they existed would provide joined up care, accommodation and support. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore shelter models and evidence-based practice, including expansion of Housing First, to improve outcomes for rough sleepers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4.3 Brighton & Hove City Council is exploring models of shelter provision being provided in other areas of the UK and is looking at evidence based practice to design services which gives rough sleepers the best opportunity to recover from homelessness. This includes the expansion of Housing First a model of support with a strong evidence base of positive outcomes for rough sleepers. At present, there is no identified budget or building for the provision of a Nightshelter for all rough sleepers.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission and complete a feasibility report defining a new integrated healthcare facility for homeless and disadvantaged people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.5 Homeless Healthcare services in the city are recognised as an exemplar model by NHSE/I with the potential to be replicated across the country. The CCG acknowledges the Coroner’s direction to develop a homeless healthcare hub with all necessary services under one roof. We believe the current commissioned service could be enhanced to develop a more integrated service with the Local Authority. A Feasibility Report has been commissioned to develop a strategic definition and preparation of the brief on behalf of Arch Health CIC for the development of a new healthcare facility for homeless and disadvantaged people in Brighton.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 11 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission an integrated homeless healthcare service providing primary care, hospital outreach, community engagement, day-centre outreach and citywide leadership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.2 In responding to the Coroner’s Direction, the CCG commissions as successful and integrated service model through Arch Health who provide integrated healthcare to homeless people in Brighton & Hove. In February 2017, Arch took over the Integrated Homeless Healthcare Hub contract, which includes a GP surgery, hospital in reach services, community health engagement, outreach to day centres and citywide leadership.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 11 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the healthcare feasibility report to incorporate learning from the Covid-19 response and homeless population needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.7 The Feasibility Report was concluded in February 2020. Subsequently, the CCG has had to focus on the response to the Covid-19 crisis. As we enter the recovery period following the initial phase of Covid response, we will be reviewing the feasibility report to include learning from the Covid response in”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 11 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand winter night shelter provision through an open-access weekend shelter service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.11 Extending Night Shelter Provision”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 7 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The local authority is responsible for delivering the response and actions concerning the safe night shelter direction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.4 Brighton & Hove City Council (BHCC) is responsible for providing the night shelter and homelessness services, therefore is responsible for delivering a response to and actions towards the direction A.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A year-round night shelter cannot currently be provided because there is no identified budget or suitable building.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4.3 Brighton & Hove City Council is exploring models of shelter provision being provided in other areas of the UK and is looking at evidence based practice to design services which gives rough sleepers the best opportunity to recover from homelessness. This includes the expansion of Housing First a model of support with a strong evidence base of positive outcomes for rough sleepers. At present, there is no identified budget or building for the provision of a Nightshelter for all rough sleepers.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The clinical commissioning group is responsible for delivering the response and actions concerning the homeless healthcare hub direction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.5 Brighton & Hove CCG is responsible for providing healthcare provision to the street homeless population and commission the Arch Healthcare Hub, therefore is responsible for delivering a response to and actions towards the direction B.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing accommodation provision is considered sufficient to prevent rough sleeping during the poorest weather.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.3 In addition, during the winter period there is a direct access Severe Weather Emergency protocol shelter, which is open when the temperature is predicted to be ‘feels like’ zero or below or there is an amber weather warning.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Available evidence does not show that night shelters improve rough sleepers’ health or substance-misuse outcomes, and vulnerable people may not access them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.1 The final consideration for the provision of a Nightshelter for all rough sleepers is the need for evidence that this model will have a positive impact on the outcomes of rough sleepers. Evidence of the impact of Nightshelters on rough sleepers is very limited. The data provided by Homeless Impact in the link below concludes that Nightshelter provision does not have a positive outcome on health or substance misuse outcomes for rough sleepers.”

Source location

2020-0078-Response-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners_Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 16 April 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026