PFD report

David Moran · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Jan 2017•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Ineffective communication between administrative staff and nursing or clinical staff
  2. Lack of a default to urgent referral when screening is not possible or referral information is doubtful or ambiguous
  3. Imprecise guidance for categorising referral urgency
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable referral urgency categorisation and prioritisation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Implement the telephone triage system and supporting procedures, including urgent face-to-face assessment within 72 hours where triage is uncertain or refused.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ineffective communication between administrative staff and nursing or clinical staff

Wider context from the report

“(2) Communication between administrative staff and nursing / clinical staff did not appear to be effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a default to urgent referral when screening is not possible or referral information is doubtful or ambiguous

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust Guidance for categorising the urgency of a referral appeared imprecise. Further, in that the referral system will often depend on a telephone conversation only, there did not appear to be a default to urgent in a case where a screening assessment was not possible or in a case of doubt or ambiguity. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Imprecise guidance for categorising referral urgency

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust Guidance for categorising the urgency of a referral appeared imprecise. Further, in that the referral system will often depend on a telephone conversation only, there did not appear to be a default to urgent in a case where a screening assessment was not possible or in a case of doubt or ambiguity. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable referral urgency categorisation and prioritisation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the telephone triage system and supporting procedures, including urgent face-to-face assessment within 72 hours where triage is uncertain or refused.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since August 2016 a clinical project group has been developing a telephone triage system for the Assessment Team and this has been piloted in Warrington in December 2016. The project has been positively evaluated and Standard Operating Procedures developed to support the roll-out of this initiative.”

Source location

2017-0008-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Establish daily senior clinical review of referrals and a morning meeting to identify referrals and delegate actions and responsibilities.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.
  2. 2

    Brief Assessment Team staff to document all patient and referral information contemporaneously in RiO.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.
  3. 3

    Provide lessons-learned training covering updated guidance and systems to the Assessment Team.

    Stated by North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish daily senior clinical review of referrals and a morning meeting to identify referrals and delegate actions and responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Information on RiO is available to all staff 24 hours a day. The Assessment Team now has a robust system in place whereby a senior clinical member of staff reviews all referrals on a daily basis and this information is relayed into the teams daily record morning meeting in which referrals are identified and actions and responsibilities for all staff are delegated.”

Source location

2017-0008-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief Assessment Team staff to document all patient and referral information contemporaneously in RiO.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Team has been briefed that all information relating to a patient and their referral must be documented within the electronic patient recording system RiO contemporaneously.”

Source location

2017-0008-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide lessons-learned training covering updated guidance and systems to the Assessment Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Training in the form of lessons learned took place with the team through January 2016 and included an update of guidance and systems currently in place.”

Source location

2017-0008-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-trust
Page 2 · response
Published 19 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026