PFD report

Jessica Evie BAKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Oct 2023•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of school commuter coach drivers to wear seatbelts
  2. Failure of school commuter coach passengers to use fitted seatbelts
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Add a reference to the personal seat-belt responsibility of children aged 14 and over to the THINK! road-safety website.

    Stated by Department for Education and Department for TransportStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 October 2023.
  2. Action

    Review further opportunities to increase the visibility of seat-belt advice for passengers and drivers.

    Stated by Department for Education and Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 October 2023.
  3. Action

    Develop and launch a national THINK! campaign promoting seat-belt wearing, including potential messages about buses and coaches.

    Stated by Department for Education and Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 October 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Practical fairness and distraction risks prevent imposing a legal duty on coach drivers to ensure under-14s wear seat belts.

    Stated by Department for Education and Department for TransportUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of school commuter coach drivers to wear seatbelts

Wider context from the report

“This was a school commuter coach travelling on a motorway. It was constructed after 2001 and will have had seat belts fitted. Review of CCTV does not show the seatbelts were being used. This coach had secondary school children on board. Some of the pupils those below 14 years of age would be expected to wear seatbelts under driver supervision. The driver did not appear to be wearing a seat belt. A distinction should be drawn between school buses in built-up areas and school commuter coaches travelling a distance using A roads and the motorway network – with regard to the availability and use of seatbelts. I take judicial notice that using seat belts can prevent some injury altogether, make inevitable injury less severe and reduce the risk of fatal injury. 1.     What advice does government through the Department of Transport, or the Department of Education give to schools and colleges when contracting for school bus commuter products – about the use of seatbelts? 2.     What public information campaigns are being run about the additional road safety provided by the use of seatbelts? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of school commuter coach passengers to use fitted seatbelts

Wider context from the report

“This was a school commuter coach travelling on a motorway. It was constructed after 2001 and will have had seat belts fitted. Review of CCTV does not show the seatbelts were being used. This coach had secondary school children on board. Some of the pupils those below 14 years of age would be expected to wear seatbelts under driver supervision. The driver did not appear to be wearing a seat belt. A distinction should be drawn between school buses in built-up areas and school commuter coaches travelling a distance using A roads and the motorway network – with regard to the availability and use of seatbelts. I take judicial notice that using seat belts can prevent some injury altogether, make inevitable injury less severe and reduce the risk of fatal injury. 1.     What advice does government through the Department of Transport, or the Department of Education give to schools and colleges when contracting for school bus commuter products – about the use of seatbelts? 2.     What public information campaigns are being run about the additional road safety provided by the use of seatbelts? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a reference to the personal seat-belt responsibility of children aged 14 and over to the THINK! road-safety website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This is something the DfT takes very seriously and is why DfT runs its THINK! campaigns. The THINK! team produces educational materials for schools and dedicated advice for drivers and other road users. DfT recognises that the section of the THINK! website dealing with road safety laws would benefit from the addition of a”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review further opportunities to increase the visibility of seat-belt advice for passengers and drivers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“reference to children aged 14 plus being personally responsible for wearing their seat belt. This has now been added and DfT Officials are reviewing further opportunities to increase the presence of seat belt wearing advice for passengers and drivers. DfT will do this by the end of the year.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and launch a national THINK! campaign promoting seat-belt wearing, including potential messages about buses and coaches.

Verbatim wording from the response

“THINK! is the DFT’s long-running and respected road safety campaign. THINK! aims to reduce the number of people killed and seriously injured on the roads by changing attitudes and behaviours among those at most risk. In 2021 30% of car occupant fatalities were not wearing a seat belt compared with 19% in 2013. 17-29 year olds are over represented in fatalities: 40% v 30% of all car occupants in 2021. The team is currently working on a dedicated campaign to promote seat belt wearing; the first national seat belt campaign since 2011. It will be launched in March 2024. This campaign will be targeting those most at risk – young men. The campaign will also, however, provide an opportunity to raise awareness on a national scale and can include wider messages, for example about wearing seat belts on buses and coaches, within the stakeholder toolkit and social content.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share updated seat-belt compliance guidance and campaign messaging with education settings through sector communications and digital channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DfE will work closely with the THINK campaign team at DfT to ensure education materials on seat belt compliance are shared with education settings and are embedded. This will include sharing DfT’s updated guidance on seat belt compliance and messaging from campaigns on seat belt safety in communications to the sector as well as across our own digital channels. This will coincide with the update to the DfT’s website and campaign launch in March 2024. DfE also proposes to make a small amendment to the existing statutory guidance on home-to-school travel to state that parts of it, including the sections on promoting good behaviour in transport, will be of particular relevance to schools that arrange home-to-school transport for their pupils. DfE will aim to do this early in the New Year.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that DVSA remind bus operators of their seat-belt notification obligations by the end of December 2023.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A bus operator is required to take reasonable steps to notify passengers of the requirement to wear a seat belt. This can be done through official announcements, audio-visual presentations, or prominently displayed signs at each seat. It is an offence to fail to comply with this requirement. To address this, we have requested that the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) remind operators of their obligation through a communication to be sent out by the end of December 2023. This will help to ensure that passengers are properly informed about the necessity of wearing seat belts.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Practical fairness and distraction risks prevent imposing a legal duty on coach drivers to ensure under-14s wear seat belts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This lacuna is something that the DfT has considered on several occasions over many years and has considered again upon receipt of your report. After careful consideration, it maintains the position that imposing a legal obligation on coach drivers to ensure that all children aged under 14 wear seat belts would be inappropriate. Such a requirement is seen as unfair to drivers, considering the potential number of children on a coach, and it could pose a distraction with significant road safety implications. As a result, the DfT does not intend to make any changes to the current seat belt wearing requirements.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Local authorities are legally responsible for arranging eligible children's home-to-school travel, rather than schools.

    Stated by Department for Education and Department for TransportRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local authorities are legally responsible for arranging eligible children's home-to-school travel, rather than schools.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It may help to begin by providing some background information about home to school travel. The DfE does not issue any guidance specifically directed at schools on the provision of home-to-school travel. This is because local authorities (LAs) are”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport and Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 18 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026