PFD report

Helen DAVEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Oct 2024•County Durham and Darlington

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Gas piston bed mechanisms presenting a risk to life on failure
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Write to relevant trade bodies to disseminate awareness of the incident and lifting-mechanism risks for consideration in similar products.

    Stated by Department for Business, Innovation, Science and TradeStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 October 2024.
  2. Action

    Request that BSI review relevant furniture standards to address Ottoman-bed safety and unexpected descent after lifting-mechanism failure.

    Stated by Department for Business, Innovation, Science and TradeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 October 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The British Standards Institution is responsible for independently producing and reviewing relevant technical standards for Ottoman-style beds.

    Stated by Department for Business, Innovation, Science and TradeRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Gas piston bed mechanisms presenting a risk to life on failure

Wider context from the report

“The existence and use of gas piston bed mechanisms whose failure presents risk to life. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to relevant trade bodies to disseminate awareness of the incident and lifting-mechanism risks for consideration in similar products.

Verbatim wording from the response

“OPSS is writing to relevant trade bodies, including the National Bed Federation, the British Furniture Manufactures Association and British Furniture Confederation, to ask that they make their members aware of the incident and the potential risk should a lifting mechanism fail, so that they can ensure that risk has been considered and addressed in any similar products.”

Source location

Response from OPSS
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that BSI review relevant furniture standards to address Ottoman-bed safety and unexpected descent after lifting-mechanism failure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“OPSS has also contacted the British Standards Institution (BSI), the UK’s national standards body, about this incident. BSI are responsible for independently producing national and international technical standards, and I know they have already raised awareness of this with their counterparts in the international and European standards bodies. OPSS has written to request that BSI reviews relevant UK furniture standards, including standards for furniture testing methods, to ensure they adequately address the safety of Ottoman-style beds, including how they prevent beds from descending unexpectedly should a lifting mechanism fail. While product standards are voluntary, they can assist businesses in complying with their legal safety obligations.”

Source location

Response from OPSS
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The British Standards Institution is responsible for independently producing and reviewing relevant technical standards for Ottoman-style beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“OPSS has also contacted the British Standards Institution (BSI), the UK’s national standards body, about this incident. BSI are responsible for independently producing national and international technical standards, and I know they have already raised awareness of this with their counterparts in the international and European standards bodies. OPSS has written to request that BSI reviews relevant UK furniture standards, including standards for furniture testing methods, to ensure they adequately address the safety of Ottoman-style beds, including how they prevent beds from descending unexpectedly should a lifting mechanism fail. While product standards are voluntary, they can assist businesses in complying with their legal safety obligations.”

Source location

Response from OPSS
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Further product-safety investigation cannot proceed because the available information does not identify the specific bed model or manufacturer.

    Stated by Department for Business, Innovation, Science and TradeUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further product-safety investigation cannot proceed because the available information does not identify the specific bed model or manufacturer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following media reports of this incident, OPSS contacted Durham Constabulary to request further details including any information that would help to identify the specific product involved. In response, we received photos of the bed and brief details of the scene. However, from the limited information available we have been unable to identify the specific product model or manufacturer to investigate whether the product was non-compliant with GPSR. If you hold any further information about the product, or should more information come to light, we will of course review it with a view to further action.”

Source location

Response from OPSS
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026