Raymond John MORAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Feb 2026•East Riding and Hull

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Incomplete falls risk documentation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management
  2. Inaccurate falls risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  3. Failure to update falls risk assessments as required
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Humber Health Partnership

    Introduce Ward 32 spot checks and leadership oversight of documentation and reassessment completion.

  2. Humber Health Partnership

    Conduct a specialist falls audit or accreditation review of Ward 32 to identify gaps, recommend improvements, and assess measurable progress.

  3. Humber Health Partnership

    Implement Ward 32 actions covering falls training, documented call-bell education, timely post-fall medical review, 4AT assessment, lying and standing blood pressure, transfer assessments, and AFLOAT checks.

  4. Humber Health Partnership

    Reinforce reassessment of relevant clinical assessments when patients transfer between clinical areas across inpatient wards.

  5. Humber Health Partnership

    Complete multidisciplinary post-fall debrief and SWARM review to identify systemic falls-prevention learning.

  6. Humber Health Partnership

    Monitor training, falls assessments, transfer reassessments, documentation, delirium assessment, post-fall reviews, and audit findings through local and group governance.

  7. Humber Health Partnership

    Review Ward 32 falls-training compliance and take targeted action to raise compliance to or above the 85% target through staff learning and governance oversight.

  8. Humber Health Partnership

    Use the group falls prevention strategic action plan and wider programme to oversee organisational learning and improvement.

  9. Humber Health Partnership

    Provide Falls Prevention Team educator support to Ward 32 staff on completing falls assessments and associated documentation.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Humber Health Partnership

    Falls risk had been recognised and multiple prevention measures were in place before the fall, despite shortcomings in transfer reassessment and documentation.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incomplete falls risk documentation

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was heard at inquest that not only was the falls risk assessment inaccurate, but also, it was not updated as it should have been. In addition, the documentation was incomplete. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate falls risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was heard at inquest that not only was the falls risk assessment inaccurate, but also, it was not updated as it should have been. In addition, the documentation was incomplete. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update falls risk assessments as required

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was heard at inquest that not only was the falls risk assessment inaccurate, but also, it was not updated as it should have been. In addition, the documentation was incomplete. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable documentation of falls-risk management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce Ward 32 spot checks and leadership oversight of documentation and reassessment completion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Additional ward-level assurance measures Further local assurance measures are being put in place within Ward 32 to improve completion of documentation and reassessments. These include increased spot checks by ward leadership, review of whether assessments have been completed at the start of the day and strengthened local oversight involving ward sisters and junior sisters. The purpose of this is to embed compliance and ensure incomplete documentation is identified promptly and addressed.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a specialist falls audit or accreditation review of Ward 32 to identify gaps, recommend improvements, and assess measurable progress.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Specialist audit / accreditation review Ward 32 is being prioritised for a specialist falls audit / accreditation review to identify any remaining gaps, to provide targeted recommendations, and to support the ward in achieving the required standard. This will also provide further assurance regarding whether the actions taken have resulted in measurable improvement.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 3 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Ward 32 actions covering falls training, documented call-bell education, timely post-fall medical review, 4AT assessment, lying and standing blood pressure, transfer assessments, and AFLOAT checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Immediate local review and learning The incident was subject to an immediate post-fall debrief and subsequent multidisciplinary SWARM review. These identified a number of specific actions for Ward 32, including:”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce reassessment of relevant clinical assessments when patients transfer between clinical areas across inpatient wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Reinforcement of transfer reassessment requirements The Trust has reinforced with ward teams the requirement that, when a patient transfers between clinical areas, the relevant assessments must be reviewed and repeated in accordance with policy. This learning has been recognised not simply as a ward-specific issue but as a theme relevant to inpatient ward areas more broadly. The SWARM expressly identified this learning as applicable group wide.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete multidisciplinary post-fall debrief and SWARM review to identify systemic falls-prevention learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the incident, the Trust undertook both an immediate post-fall debrief and a multidisciplinary post-fall SWARM review. Those reviews identified local learning, including the need to strengthen documentation and reassessment processes, particularly in relation to ensuring multifactorial falls assessments are completed and updated on transfer, ensuring recent falls history and other relevant risk factors are clearly reflected in the assessment, ensuring formal assessment of suspected confusion or delirium is undertaken where indicated, ensuring lying and standing blood pressure is reconsidered when a patient becomes more mobile enough for this to be completed, reinforcing expectations regarding timely medical review after a fall, and improving the consistency of contemporaneous recording of falls prevention activity and post-fall management.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor training, falls assessments, transfer reassessments, documentation, delirium assessment, post-fall reviews, and audit findings through local and group governance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“9. Monitoring and assurance The Trust will monitor the effectiveness of these actions through local and group governance processes. This will include review of:”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 3 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Ward 32 falls-training compliance and take targeted action to raise compliance to or above the 85% target through staff learning and governance oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Training and ward-level compliance Ward 32 training compliance has been reviewed. The target for falls-related training is 85%. The current Ward 32 figures supplied for the purpose of this response are:”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the group falls prevention strategic action plan and wider programme to oversee organisational learning and improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7. Group-wide governance and strategic action The Trust’s response is not limited to Ward 32. The learning from this incident has been considered through the wider group falls prevention work programme and strategic action planning.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 3 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Falls Prevention Team educator support to Ward 32 staff on completing falls assessments and associated documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Targeted support from the Falls Prevention Team The Falls Prevention Team has agreed to provide additional practical support to Ward 32, including educator input to work directly with staff on the ward in relation to the correct completion of assessments and associated documentation. This support is intended to help embed practice and improve consistency.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Falls risk had been recognised and multiple prevention measures were in place before the fall, despite shortcomings in transfer reassessment and documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, the Trust considers it important to clarify that the patient’s falls risk had been recognised during the admission and that a number of falls prevention measures were in place prior to the fall. The post-fall debrief and SWARM review record that the patient had access to the call bell and had previously used it, had non-slip socks in place, had an appropriate bed rail assessment with bed rails raised in accordance with that assessment, had a Zimmer frame at the bedside, and had a mobility plan of Zimmer frame with assistance of two. The reviews also record that he was identified as being at risk of falls, that a falls risk assessment had been completed on admission, and that the relevant falls prevention measures were in place, albeit with shortcomings in reassessment and documentation on transfer.”

Source location

Response from City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire
Page 1 · response
Published 2 March 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026